wiedelphine

4 ms·

1.
by wiedelphine 8mo ago
The article says its hurting business. Its also an inefficent use of space and blocks throughfares. The space is designed with the lateral queues in mind.
2.
by wiedelphine 11mo ago
I understood this to be a comment on the fact that a text interface has a lower affordance than a graphical interface. A command line doesnt suggest what you can do in the way a graphical interface can.So even if you have industry standard
3.
by wiedelphine 1y ago
A lot of the new redevelopment that is going on is in areas where the Tokyo Metropolian goverment have relaxed/suspended the old zoning laws etc, hence the fact the new development is all big high rises, and more identitkit than previo
4.
by wiedelphine 2y ago
It is a british phrase. I think the most commmon usage is 'put a rocket up their arse, or 'put a rocket under them; It's similar to 'light a fire under'. It means to suggest getting somebody who has been previously
5.
by wiedelphine 3y ago
I had a similar thought untill I read that actually for or people with motor/muscle issues issues, a push button or something like the lever in the above which doesnt require physical strength is much easier. I think the original intr
6.
by wiedelphine 3y ago
As far as I know, the audience for gov.uk forms is teams that have no developers. So for that audience, email is very much the right approach. Often the thing you are replacing is 'fill in this pdf and email to this inbox', so it
7.
by wiedelphine 3y ago
Building stuff is always impressive so well done on that. For me it feels a bit like you are saying the audience for this is 'people who want their friends to pay for them to do stuff'? My question would be if I know these people
8.
by wiedelphine 3y ago
My understanding is that the main cause for failure was being brought up by private equity, loaded up with debt, and then being hit by huge interest rate rises.
9.
by wiedelphine 5y ago
Given the amount of user research that is done on the guidance that is added to the design system, I would imagine they've tested it with users and found it works. It also fits in with their style guide, which talks about writing in a
10.
by wiedelphine 5y ago
I mean surely questioning current ways of working is how you stay innovative and respond to a changing world? it feels odd to imply they have reached peak innovation and should just stay the same.
11.
by wiedelphine 5y ago
the challenge I've always seen with putting the user hat on on so to speak is the difficulty in behaving as though you don't know how it works. I've seen enough user research where things that were obvious to the tram were no
12.
by wiedelphine 5y ago
It sounds more like an umbrella company than a chambers if I reading it correctly. in that they aren't finding you work like a chambers would
13.
by wiedelphine 5y ago
It feels like you are suggesting that under a certain amount looking at images of children being sexually abused or tortured shouldn't have an impact on mental health? For me personally I think even a single image like that would haunt