whoknowsidont

5 ms·

61.
by whoknowsidont 11mo ago
>.NET was a solid choice for backend builds before Node became so popular The problem with the community is that this statement has been said for every version in every era despite how untrue it is lol. No matter what ills or blights .NE
62.
by whoknowsidont 11mo ago
I like how the study you linked had to so loosely define "restrictions" as to make their point. Do you really think that's an intelligent way to reason about this? Surely you understand the concept of quality vs quantity, whi
63.
by whoknowsidont 11mo ago
>It's fairly clear to me that our civilization is in decline Because of deregulation, if anything.
64.
by whoknowsidont 11mo ago
I am actively involved in multiple threads across this post. Claiming I have no interest in "honest discussion" when it's clear people are engaging constructively elsewhere is a delusional take. You came in, made things quite
65.
by whoknowsidont 11mo ago
>To get this out of the way, you are an unpleasant person You are clearly very emotional about this, for whatever reason. But again it has no place on this forum. >I would point out that I haven't see one link in all of your rail
66.
by whoknowsidont 11mo ago
Please give this a read before engaging further: https://huggingface.co/docs/hugs/en/guides/function-calling You're just utilizing your ignorance to yap at this point.
67.
by whoknowsidont 11mo ago
Probably a good read for you to start with: https://raz.sh/blog/2025-05-02_a_critical_look_at_mcp There are tons of articles detailing the problems if you are genuinely interested. Notice you couldn't technically
68.
by whoknowsidont 11mo ago
You linked to one part of the spec and just wanted to ignore everything else? That's fine, but then you wouldn't be obeying the standard and wouldn't be an "MCP." So, are you agreeing with me? Respectfully I think I
69.
by whoknowsidont 11mo ago
>, they just teach them how to use the tools and then the LLM calls the APIs directly as any HTTP client would. No. MCP does not do this. Function & tool calling is built into the LLM. MCP is not augmenting this ability in ANY way.
70.
by whoknowsidont 11mo ago
It's not even a standard. It's literally not doing anything here. Not only "can" you rip out MCP there is zero technical reason for any of those things to be an "MCP" in the first place.
71.
by whoknowsidont 11mo ago
Can you do yourself a favor and look at the source code and tell me why you think MCP is necessary here? I mean you just took some examples and went "See MCP!" without any actual understanding of what that code is doing. All of th
72.
by whoknowsidont 11mo ago
>observability Which MCP does the opposite of. It hides information.
73.
by whoknowsidont 11mo ago
>They have significant data trained on MCP. No they don't lol.
74.
by whoknowsidont 11mo ago
>It's JSON-RPC, with some descriptors. That's not even true. It defines the lifecycle of tool calling. JSON-RPC with some descriptors would have been fine and amazing.
75.
by whoknowsidont 11mo ago
Great! It's still irrelevant.
76.
by whoknowsidont 11mo ago
>is higher as an MCP server than as a CLI command. What do you mean by "higher"?
77.
by whoknowsidont 11mo ago
Most likely! It's hard to qualify which specific models and version I'm talking about because they're constantly being updated. But the point is that function & tool calling was already built in. If you take a model from
78.
by whoknowsidont 11mo ago
>dynamically exposes mcp tools as tool calls. It doesn't even do that. It's not magic.
79.
by whoknowsidont 11mo ago
Training data =/= web search Both ChatGPT and Claude will perform web searches when you ask them a question, which the fact that you got this confused is ironically topical. But you're still misunderstanding the principle point be
80.
by whoknowsidont 11mo ago
>it is "known" at least as much as any other protocol. No. It is not. Please understand what the LLM's are doing. Claude nor ChatGPT nor any major model knows what MCP is. They know how to function & tool call. They ha
81.
by whoknowsidont 11mo ago
>This effect is _significantly_ stronger than putting info about available API/cli into CLAUDE.md. No it's not. Honestly this conversation is extremely weird to me because somehow people are gravely misunderstanding what MCP ev
82.
by whoknowsidont 11mo ago
>but isn't this solved by publishing good API docs, and then pointing the LLM to those docs as a training resource? Yes. It's not a dumb question. The situation is so dumb you feel like an idiot for asking the obvious question.
83.
by whoknowsidont 11mo ago
MCP was a really shitty attempt at building a plugin framework that was vague enough to lure people into and then allow other companies to build plugin platforms to take care of the MCP non-sense. "What is MCP, what does it bring to th
84.
by whoknowsidont 11mo ago
>they tend to be as stable as any other cloud provider Absolutely not.
85.
by whoknowsidont 11mo ago
Another outage brought to you by Azure.
86.
by whoknowsidont 11mo ago
Sounds strangely American.
87.
by whoknowsidont 11mo ago
VRChat has such an amazing, creative community.
88.
by whoknowsidont 11mo ago
>I just honestly can't believe that someone who managed remote teams in 2005 thinks it's the same as managing in 2025 Because it ruins your narrative, not because it's a factual observation lol. The software your entire li
89.
by whoknowsidont 11mo ago
>static for decades I was chastised for not giving specific examples. Any examples, really. >The level of cluelessness on display here is just baffling to me. I encourage you to give this thread an honest, deep think about why you fee
90.
by whoknowsidont 11mo ago
>Gigabit internet - video call quality is significantly better than it was 10-15 years ago. You don't need gigabit internet for good video quality. We solved this with the MPEG-4, specifically H.264. Most video streaming software st

More ›