Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
whoitwas
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
16 ms
·
181.
▲
by
whoitwas
2y ago
Complete chaos. Retribution. Whatever the goon encounters. RIP USA
182.
▲
by
whoitwas
2y ago
No doubt. Sell while the markets still exist.
183.
▲
by
whoitwas
2y ago
Maybe. But you would experience less risk. How much will someone gain from now until 2028? I'm sitting on cash.
184.
▲
by
whoitwas
2y ago
Without reigning in campaign finance, it's real. Criminals rejoice! Let's loot this fucker!
185.
▲
by
whoitwas
2y ago
RIP USA and the world. Bye guys.
186.
▲
by
whoitwas
2y ago
I don't think it's like that. These substances cause nasty forms of cancer and are easily avoidable. I don't understand the purpose of Teflon other than to poison people. It's really odd how people follow even when they
187.
▲
by
whoitwas
2y ago
There are many things to consider and it's up to each individual. It can become exhausting if you choose to continue to learn and grow, but if you don't ... what are you doing?
188.
▲
by
whoitwas
2y ago
It's not possible to fry in a safe range. The safe range is <500F. I use pans at a greater temperature than that for frying. Additionally, when the pans wear the surface degrades and becomes your food. This probably always occurs, b
189.
▲
by
whoitwas
2y ago
After I learned about the harmful effects of Teflon, I became much more cautious about consumption. It's nearly impossible to avoid the toxins when eating out because wax has been replaced with synthetics that leach into food from pack
190.
▲
by
whoitwas
2y ago
Yeah. It's been a while. This is interesting
191.
▲
by
whoitwas
2y ago
I thought safe harbor was the relevant statute here (section 512 of DMCA)?
192.
▲
by
whoitwas
2y ago
"Section 230 protects you from the consequences of publishing someone else's speech." Right. "Where we are right now is deciding if the algorithm is pumping out your speech or it is pumping out someone else's speech
193.
▲
by
whoitwas
2y ago
The user who made the bonkers content is liable.
194.
▲
by
whoitwas
2y ago
(Not the marketers). If this sort of logic held, health insurance wouldn't exist. I would love to be proven wrong, but I can't imagine it in U$A.
195.
▲
by
whoitwas
2y ago
I don't disagree, but how would you propose regulating that? Laws are made with money, so the advertisers win unless we can outspend them. That seems unlikely to me.
196.
▲
by
whoitwas
2y ago
I don't like marketers or advertising, but I don't understand what you mean by: "Advertising in public spaces". In the US, advertising is always on private property.
197.
▲
by
whoitwas
2y ago
This is nonsense. Consumer workstations were proprietary. The internet was made by government grants and us.
198.
▲
by
whoitwas
2y ago
That's the point. It wouldn't exist. It's not possible without research and OSS. You can't write off the entire foundation of CS before a date. Well you can, but it's ignoring history.
199.
▲
by
whoitwas
2y ago
analogy: A similarity in some respects between things that are otherwise dissimilar.
200.
▲
by
whoitwas
2y ago
License does matter. Without OSS, computing as we know it doesn't exist. A better analogy would be if roads and utility cables were built as open source, everyone used them for free, then they were acquired by giant companies who charg
201.
▲
by
whoitwas
2y ago
The main constraint to a solution is the size and scale of chemical companies who lobby to create rules in their favor. There's no practical solution to this problem, the best we can do is educate people to live and consume sustainably
202.
▲
by
whoitwas
2y ago
Why do you say everything is chemicals like it's some sort of gotcha? That's very obvious. There's a clear context here. You're rejecting context and screaming, "chemicals!"
203.
▲
by
whoitwas
2y ago
There are a wide array of problems from plastics to herbicides and pesticides related to consumption. There's also the sustainability issue as laid out in this article. It's unclear what your contention is other than you might not
204.
▲
by
whoitwas
2y ago
Nice. This is a bad faith argument as we can attempt progress safely without poisoning the entire planet -- within the laws we pay for of course.
205.
▲
by
whoitwas
2y ago
Go look at videos from the 70s before we began ingesting chemicals and tons of calories. Everyone is half the size with 99% less body fat.
206.
▲
by
whoitwas
2y ago
At what cost? You would need to monitor your spyware all day to gain any value. I'd rather save the time and read the news more efficiently.
207.
▲
by
whoitwas
2y ago
Seriously. From what I've learned United needs the axe more than many corporations. Somewhere below Nestle, but above BP maybe?
208.
▲
by
whoitwas
2y ago
My objection is it's too granular and bad faith operators will only pivot slightly to continue to exploit. It seems ineffective.
209.
▲
by
whoitwas
2y ago
That's horrible. It sounds odd to me because I wear earplugs to sleep or do loud things. To not hear things seems the opposite of a concert.
210.
▲
by
whoitwas
2y ago
It's semi-comical that the subtitle contains "AI-Generated". Even gov is on the hype train.
More ›