whiskytango111

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by whiskytango111 3y ago

   I agree that it’s worse in like 99% of cases that 1% though overly influenced my word choice :) To your other point, I wasn’t trying to be as hand wavy as that came across. There will always be people who make mistakes or are not good fits
2. 2.▲
   by whiskytango111 3y ago

   Companies only want people that are in he A bucket. That’s what market rate is. If you aren’t actually and truly in the A group then your company is thinking about how to pay you less, replace you eventually, or invest in other people who l
3. 3.▲
   by whiskytango111 3y ago

   That’s just bad management. High quality work that doesn’t actually move the business needle is almost the same as if people didn’t even come in at all. That said managing a large organization is extremely hard. I don’t think most companies
4. 4.▲
   by whiskytango111 3y ago

   As an SVP of Eng: Market dynamics and pay equity mostly force me to pay everyone the same. Not everyone gets paid the same but little disparity between people of high impact and low. Ie most companies total annual comp between people is a l
5. 5.▲
   by whiskytango111 3y ago

   Not disagreeing with your perspective but as an exec here is my perspective A) The most valuable people can notice problems, find solutions and get it done (either themselves or by articulating a pragmatic plan). B) People that show up and