whatwrongwyou

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by whatwrongwyou 1y ago

   Don't go to any public speaking events
2. 2.▲
   by whatwrongwyou 1y ago

   Even if that location is a fire-prone hillside in Los Angeles? Is the gormlessness of a housing choice correlated with the income of the homeowner?
3. 3.▲
   by whatwrongwyou 1y ago

   This presumes that everyone who builds in coastal areas is "gormless" and deserves hardship. Millions of people live on islands and they don't get a choice where they build. Several Polynesian countries will disappear by the
4. 4.▲
   by whatwrongwyou 1y ago

   "The article makes it sound like", which I used to emphasize the seeming misunderstanding that the author seems to have. Insurers aren't stupid. I don't think the author is stupid either; I think they're just not a
5. 5.▲
   by whatwrongwyou 1y ago

   This seems based on outdated science to me. The world isn't just "getting hotter", the overall climate is changing due solely to human influence. The article makes it sound like insurers believe houses will start spontaneousl
6. 6.▲
   by whatwrongwyou 1y ago

   State actors are smart enough to follow the law of large numbers.
7. 7.▲
   by whatwrongwyou 1y ago

   I'm not sure what you call this fallacy. It's not really whataboutism because you're not equivocating against another argument, but instead you just discard it and push forward on the path that you've chosen for this int