welkinSL

5 ms·

1.
by welkinSL 2y ago
I wish to be proved wrong too. The current situation of "LLM" and "GPT" are very much like a hype. I cannot see how they can be used beyond problems that does NOT require accuracy and precision. IMO the problem lies on
2.
by welkinSL 2y ago
I love Emacs but I just don't find editing LaTeX on Emacs an enjoyable. I am mostly using Overleaf (overleaf.com) which is free for individual use. They only charge for collaboration features and integration with bibliography managemen
3.
by welkinSL 2y ago
As much as I love my experience with Homebrew, it is not easy to maintain it so understandably the project tends to only support the latest few OS versions. This can be problematic for older laptops. Linux on the other hand tends to work be
4.
by welkinSL 2y ago
When I first switched I mainly rely on easy custom, with minimal lisp code. However, a few issues: 1. many popular packages did NOT implement for custom (e.g. by declaring with defcustom), especially those that are not in MELPA. 2. the bui
5.
by welkinSL 2y ago
Now that I have been using Emacs as my main editor for a few years, I can't really imagine my life without org-mode. Really it is just too good of a feature, if for somehow I have to switch in the feature, my number 1 requirement would
6.
by welkinSL 2y ago
I was mainly using the now sunset Atom (VSCode forked from Atom) back in school and a little bit Emacs 28 when using terminal. With the built-in custom it is not too difficult for me to make the switch after Atom got killed by Microsoft. I
7.
by welkinSL 2y ago
Maybe I haven't used Emacs for long enough but I don't think any other editor could be any better except the commercial ones which you have paid for maintenance. The thing I like about Emacs is that the community really supportive