webexcess

4 ms·

1.
by webexcess 14y ago
Yes, your code is the same as the first example generator with a single yield in a loop. The same conversion for the later examples with multiple yield statements, try: except: or try: finally: will be much hairier, though.
2.
by webexcess 14y ago
I stole that from here http://meyerweb.com/eric/css/edge/complexspiral/glassy.html
3.
by webexcess 14y ago
Thank you, I hadn't seen that. I've added that link to the bottom of my article.
4.
by webexcess 14y ago
That's a feature! Seriously though, not being able to define a serialization method can be a limitation. However, it is always possible to turn a generator into an iterator class with whatever methods you like, but the code may end up look
5.
Python Generators in Depth(excess.org)
171 points by webexcess 14y ago|26 comments
6.
Python Iterables, Iterators and Generators (part 1)(excess.org)
2 points by webexcess 14y ago|0 comments
7.
by webexcess 15y ago
It should be possible to create the exact same classes dynamically, without using exec. The only advantage I can see of the exec is that the class template string makes it a little clearer what the equivalent "normal" class definition woul
8.
by webexcess 15y ago
You can use python -i to enter interactive mode after executing a script. Maybe I should clarify that part
9.
by webexcess 15y ago
Good point. I didn't address this adequately. The usual #python response to people using the array module was to instead consider NumPy (with its excellent arrays) or use normal lists and PyPy to make it fast.
10.
Unfortunate Python(excess.org)
194 points by webexcess 15y ago|55 comments
11.
Urwid 1.0: python 3 support, terminal widget, pop-ups, tree views and more(excess.org)
2 points by webexcess 15y ago|0 comments
12.
Django Widgets, Form Fields and Model Fields Explained(excess.org)
2 points by webexcess 15y ago|0 comments
13.
Moving to Python 3(lwn.net)
2 points by webexcess 16y ago|0 comments