wdabney

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by wdabney 3y ago

   So many of these are human drivers at fault doing a hit-and-run. I did see a couple where the AV was at fault, and one poor unfortunate doggo.
2. 2.▲
   by wdabney 3y ago

   Every time we call something GPT we invariably would reference OpenAI's work. This tells me they don't want us to do that, and would instead like to control what can be called GPT and what cannot. Great, they've showed their
3. 3.▲
   by wdabney 4y ago

   This article fails the standard of rigor I would expect from a good scientific blog post. They don't define their terms, unsupported claims, relying on an appeal to authority, informal language, and absurd straw-man versions of others&
4. 4.▲
   by wdabney 6y ago

   To what degree does the EC actually get a say in this? These are both American companies, so presumably the commission cannot block the acquisition. Wouldn't this be more like saying "if you do this, we will make things painful fo
5. 5.▲
   by wdabney 7y ago

   Thanks! It felt like a very long time, but yes for neuroscience it is extremely fast and was only possible because Naoshige Uchida and his lab had already done the rodent experiments around probabilistic reward delivery. There are a lot of
6. 6.▲
   by wdabney 7y ago

   Hi, thanks for posting the news story. We can think about asymmetric regression more generally. If you have an error and apply some 'response' function f to that error you change the estimator you learn. In the case of quantile re
7. 7.▲
   by wdabney 7y ago

   First author of the paper here. If the article piques your interest, you can read the paper in question here: http://rdcu.be/b0mtA