wavesandwind

77 ms·

1.
by wavesandwind 9y ago
Yup, Martin did a fantastic job with his book. Before you would have to go through hundreds of blog post and articles to piece all that distributed systems knowledge together. It's kind incredible how much he managed to cover in a clea
2.
by wavesandwind 9y ago
Designing Data‑Intensive Applications by Martin Kleppmann
3.
by wavesandwind 9y ago
As in AI taking over the world? No, since AlphaGo is optimized to do just one thing.
4.
by wavesandwind 9y ago
Completely agree on the point that putting hard constraints like living in space is a good driver for reusability and sustainability - tech that can be put in use on Earth later. But let's look a little deeper why pollution is happenin
5.
by wavesandwind 9y ago
> is anyone doing that? the relative market values/investment in tesla (solar/electric sustainability) vs spacex strongly suggests otherwise. where is your straw man? You're bending my words a bit. Tesla's function is
6.
by wavesandwind 9y ago
Yes! I strongly agree and your definition of education if very close to what I had in mind. I also see Buddhist ideas as one of very few hopes of real change in the world. Yet, as far as science goes, the best it can do is help spread thes
7.
by wavesandwind 9y ago
Agree, yet it's not an either Mars or Earth question. Judging by priorities of corporations (making money, of course) it will certainly be both Mars and Earth.
8.
by wavesandwind 9y ago
Absolutely. One helps and complements the other quite nicely. Yet currently it feels the focus is very much shifted towards space travel. Sure, it's much more glamorous to fly through space sci-fi style than dig around in the garbage d
9.
by wavesandwind 9y ago
Space exploration and protecting the environment are not mutually exclusive. In fact, like you mentioned, they complement each other nicely. What I'm pointing at is that space exploration is not as big of an achievement as fixing &quot
10.
by wavesandwind 9y ago
Good point. Still, chances of spreading it will be higher if we don't kill ourselves first or drown in our own garbage - that's where things are going so far sadly. I don't believe that fixing self-destruction and pollution i
11.
by wavesandwind 9y ago
Good question. Perhaps. However, my point still remains that it will not stop the pollution on Earth - which will remain much cheaper to do.
12.
by wavesandwind 9y ago
I don't agree that these tendencies are what makes humanity great. First, you seem to think that humans are somehow special and above other species at who's expense "we became the masters". Would truly superior being not
13.
by wavesandwind 9y ago
So, polluting 2 worlds instead of one? Nobody will stop exploiting Earth even once new worlds become accessible.
14.
by wavesandwind 9y ago
Good to know that Bill Gates shares this viewpoint. It's not that space travel is wrong or doesn't have great potential. It's just that, in my view (and I guess it's also BG's judging from his short quote only), it
15.
by wavesandwind 12y ago
I'm currently reading a fascinating book on world-class performance, "The Art of Learning" by Josh Waizkind, a chess and martial arts champion. It gives some really great insights into the world-class players' psychology