watwut

21 ms·

571.
by watwut 3mo ago
> What? Why the hell would they need to steal or beat up people? They can buy existing mines, or establish new, robotic mines. There are no money in your world, they cant buy them. Why would the owners sell anyway? Selling the land would
572.
by watwut 3mo ago
I did worked in teams that produced crap. They were initially all able to proceed much faster then teams that did not produced crap. They felt like being super productive the whole time, cranking out issues one after another. The initial s
573.
by watwut 3mo ago
You dont need to focus if you dont care about quality. Overworked teams do it all the time.
574.
by watwut 3mo ago
> There’s no soccer competition without someone complaining about refereeing. Yeah, but most of them go without president calling Infantino to change the referee verdict. All the while the president says "I dont even know the game&q
575.
by watwut 3mo ago
If I have to proofread a map you gave me, then your tool is a shit. And I can blame it.
576.
by watwut 3mo ago
> You can easily go 10x if you don’t care about the results too much. People are also much faster when they dont care about quality at all.
577.
by watwut 3mo ago
> To do so would be a breach of fiduciary duty to their shareholders and investors, exposing them to severe personal liability and in some jurisdictions also jail time. This is not true.
578.
by watwut 3mo ago
> AI doomers have feared that a malicious AI would escape its containment and run wild on the Internet. The next step would be that it would become uncontrollable, before neutralizing humanity or maybe even killing us all. Nah, AI doomer
579.
by watwut 3mo ago
> Mining and farming. So, the plan is that AI companies will steal the mines and land from their current owners? Like, you plan to use those robots to beat up the owners and take their stuff? If your actual plan is such fascist takeover
580.
by watwut 3mo ago
> There should be a law that forces social media companies to use a different algorithm for anyone under a certain age and be required to disclose it to the public. Possibly different algorithm depending on age group. Frankly, in that ca
581.
by watwut 3mo ago
You are severely underestimating how much free stuff would 349,163,268 of American citizens need to make a small difference. To achieve that, they would need to steal farms from current owners. And they will be hated, because they stripped
582.
by watwut 3mo ago
Aaaand flagged.
583.
by watwut 3mo ago
Like they will magically create metal and food from nothing? Of course not, you will need to barter for those if there are no money. Will they create also water that will be getting more expensive due data center consumption? This is absurd
584.
by watwut 3mo ago
No they wont, because producing requires more then just "intellingence". AGI itself produces nothing. Also, if there are no money so 80%-100% of people move to barter instead of money to trade stuff. Same thing, just less effectiv
585.
by watwut 3mo ago
To compare, great depression had 25.6 unemployment rate. It helped the WWII to happen. It wont be the end of capitalism. But, it would mean major outbursts of violence and major civil war or revolution. Where AI companies will be (deserve
586.
by watwut 3mo ago
If people dont buy, company does not have money nor income. Simple as that. There will be no need to use those machines, because you cant sell the output of those machines. So, you have starwing hopeless population not buying your products.
587.
by watwut 3mo ago
I get you, but I find the whole "rogue ai" framing insufferable. The company is the wolf. They hacked the other company due to negligence and misconfigured software tool. They are literally trying to blame a software. It is absurd
588.
by watwut 3mo ago
> 80-100% unemployed This would mean that there are no AI companies at all, because there is no one to buy their products. So, they have nowhere to get money for whatever they want to sell.
589.
by watwut 3mo ago
I am saying it is unbelievable scenario and yes, I want the person dealing with it ignore it as such.
590.
by watwut 3mo ago
Sounds like a story from the IT crowd rather then real life situation.
591.
by watwut 3mo ago
> They've been crying and screaming so loud for years that there's pretty much nothing more they can do to communicate when the wolf actually becomes real. 1.) There was no change in how real the wolf is. 2.) They, literally th
592.
by watwut 3mo ago
This has nothing to do with "model" being unsafe or too powerful or whatever else excuse Antropic wants to use to ban competition. This is equivalent of sql injection and normal worm.
593.
by watwut 3mo ago
Straightforward trend extrapolation suggests that AI will consume more resources that galaxy even has. Meanwhile, believing the claims of the AI companies, 40% of people will be forever unemployable permanent underclass with no future for t
594.
by watwut 3mo ago
> Didn't they turn down the big Pentagon contract because it violated their principles? They sell to Paladin. They had argument with Pentagon about, frankly, minor differences in how to use it on the edges. They are completely comfo
595.
by watwut 3mo ago
Meh, I increasingly hate this tale. This has nothing to do with boy who cried wolf. This is either yet another doom ad campaign to scare us to pay them or simply them releasing faulty tools and then personifying tools to avoid blame.
596.
by watwut 3mo ago
Both OpenAI and Antropic already shown themselves to be extraordinary self centered, selfish and willing to lie to get their way. We are cynical, because it is blatantly clear these are not good faith actors. And yes, regulations they are
597.
by watwut 3mo ago
Yeah, disability accommodation like having single dorm room and being allowed to cook for themselves rather then using cantine. Maybe the question is why the cantine is obligatory anyway.
598.
by watwut 3mo ago
Young people with shut of from education and resources are building robots with the help of Claude after Claude existing for few years only? Like common. Young person with no support does not get to build a robot, because it is actually an
599.
by watwut 3mo ago
I read Whitaker article. And I completely stand by what I said. He was offended over the world "slave" to be used, by using contemporary language and so on. That part she wrote there was response to the outrage Musk was creating.
600.
by watwut 3mo ago
It is actually fun to read translation. It is written as if human wrote it, so it is entirely believable some movie watchers would read it.

More ›