Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
watwut
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
19 ms
·
601.
▲
by
watwut
3mo ago
> whatever bards actually composed it were writing about something that allegedly happened hundreds of years earlier and using language/style that was itself archaic at the time. How does that follow? When I read fantasy or legends,
602.
▲
by
watwut
3mo ago
If your way of talking to kids gets you fired, it was atrocious in the first place. "It takes a village to raise a child." is not about carte blanche to abuse any kid that you encounter. The saying is about kids watching and learn
603.
▲
by
watwut
3mo ago
I have seen people who don't follow news confidently say fairly absurd things. They tend to assume things are kind of like they were those 15 years ago and don't want to believe a party of or a country or a situation could have ch
604.
▲
by
watwut
3mo ago
> isn't this an attempt at 'neutral journalism'? Yes. > it seems that the current trend in journalism is to be as factual as possible, without adding in one's own biases No. It is not factual at all. Factual journa
605.
▲
by
watwut
3mo ago
One data point is that Stonewall where pride started in 1969 was run by mafia. I do not think it is safe to assume that mafias stopped owning bars in 10 years. Especially considering violent crime peaked in early 90ties.
606.
▲
by
watwut
3mo ago
The whole point is to imply you are killing a baby. Like literally. The only reason for that law is that. There is no medical reason. It does not address rational part of decisiom making either. It is an attempt at forced emotional guilting
607.
▲
by
watwut
3mo ago
It is a software system, not a person. AI is not "escaping sandbox". You have either misconfigured tool, bug in your tool or someone made it to hack the side and then it is a crime. Your A-F chain is exactly the same issue as a pr
608.
▲
by
watwut
3mo ago
First of all, "lunatics" are on the rise. They are largely winning and one of contributing factors is that non-lunatics did not opposed them for the sake of peace again and again. Second, effects of climate change will just get w
609.
▲
by
watwut
3mo ago
It is not first mover disadvantage. It is "took too much initial hype and debt while ignoring reality and long term" long term disadvantage.
610.
▲
by
watwut
3mo ago
Hegseth deliberately closed the unit that used to ensure it wont happen. The efforts to avoid civilian causaulities were deemed woke, weak and literally unmanly. And administration repeatedly threatened to destroy civilian targets.
611.
▲
by
watwut
3mo ago
That is the same thing, you just added designated sacrifice person into the loop.
612.
▲
by
watwut
3mo ago
Are you talking about Trump and conservatives here?
613.
▲
by
watwut
3mo ago
> If you think the market has it wrong, why don't you make money by betting against it? Because I am not gambler. And it is not "market" it is a casino. It does not predict, people put in bets. And like I said, while I und
614.
▲
by
watwut
3mo ago
The culture war does not speeps into the translation itself. There is literally no culture war in the book itself. Not even a hint of it. What she wrote in the last paragraph in the review is response to the usual suspects working hard to m
615.
▲
by
watwut
3mo ago
Yes, that actually happens in real lawsuits. It is not even rare.
616.
▲
by
watwut
3mo ago
Talking like a classic wont make you sound smart. It will make you sound outdated or even unable to express yourself clearly. For the record, I liked reading (some) classics. But, recommending Shakespeare dramas or Plato when the student wa
617.
▲
by
watwut
3mo ago
Except that moral panic around it has nothing to do with what actual profs in general say or think. Fairly often, it is panic about profs doing changes to courses non-professors find objectionable.
618.
▲
by
watwut
3mo ago
I remember a "beer test" as a hiring practice recommended on HN and blogs. And pointifications about how culture fit is important. And effectively mandatory games playing after work. And "united meritocracy" slogan bulls
619.
▲
by
watwut
3mo ago
Willson is actual expert. I also think that it is ok to be unrealistic in myth movie.
620.
▲
by
watwut
3mo ago
> Hoards of unemployed engineers now have access to 10x coding utilities and are looking for things to do. They will start clawing away at Google products. No way this is threat to google. For the same reason why the same hordes of engin
621.
▲
by
watwut
3mo ago
Then focus on effects of climate rather then trying to make the rest of us shut up.
622.
▲
by
watwut
3mo ago
Vigorous repetition of position when you are facing opposition that vigorously repeats their position ... is the only option. What you suggest leads to a word where only deniers tall, thus only their side is heard and thus they win. And yes
623.
▲
by
watwut
3mo ago
I am monthly active user, absolutely do not experience web through ChatGPT alone and frankly, dont mind ChatGPT being cut off stuff. AI companies forcing themselves as a middle man is not a good thing. Whoever using purely agentic worflow i
624.
▲
by
watwut
3mo ago
Unlikely. A lot of classical literature is fairly readable. The only issue are archaic words of you use old translation.
625.
▲
by
watwut
3mo ago
I am glad I did not grew in a place like that. Being able to move around independently and having those free events, museums, sports, libraries available by bicycle and public transport was nice. Better then then needing hours of drive or s
626.
▲
by
watwut
3mo ago
US does not have that much more crime.
627.
▲
by
watwut
3mo ago
Then again, the very same people complain about GDPR not being technically super specific. At some point we have to accept the pattern. People with ideological objections against any limits at all will try to frame any regulation as stupid,
628.
▲
by
watwut
3mo ago
This is downvoted, but exactly right. Moreover, government is not a singular entity. Blaming the whole government just serves to take the blame from actually guilty and attributing it to those whonwere doing the right thing.
629.
▲
by
watwut
3mo ago
Meh, everything emboldens them. Pretending there is no change also emboldens them.
630.
▲
by
watwut
3mo ago
> By now, everyone knows about climate change. Not true, I have seen people deny it on HN recently. And looking at other debates, yes it is necessary to reiterate the primary cause. Because centrists will absolutely use the lack of that
More ›