watwut

20 ms·

541.
by watwut 3mo ago
By the eay things are going, we may be 10 or less years away from legal resegration. The administration is actively working on that.
542.
by watwut 3mo ago
They literally created the situation where we are forced to use it, whether we want or not. It is pushed on us along with slop. And our work is changing from interesting to slop review. They intend to create monopoly and abuse it to extract
543.
by watwut 3mo ago
> how do I know I'm learning anything at all? I keep "proofs" of past performance. Like a drawing or a name of netflix series I barely understood or a text I wrote. Once in months, I check that stuff and see myself underst
544.
by watwut 3mo ago
> They sent it on time, and then the team lead called a meeting to ask why it hadn't arrived. The report was literally sitting in their inbox unread. Everyone could see it, but they all went through the motions of pretending it wasn
545.
by watwut 3mo ago
Popups have nothing to do with GDPR. They are reaction to Privacy and Electronic Communications Directive which predates GDPR. And yes, it is deliberate misinformation.
546.
by watwut 3mo ago
This is heavily downvoted ... and still accurate.
547.
by watwut 3mo ago
GDPR is actually good directive. Despite perpetual campaign against it from HN users who would like to abuse other peoples data.
548.
by watwut 3mo ago
> I would expect some basic "doing good is in the end more successful than doing evil" morality in shows. I dont and find it annoying when it is there all the time. It removes the tension too. Good people end up poor or die of
549.
by watwut 3mo ago
It is changing. A bulk of learners now get their vocabularies from youtube, netflix and podcasts. Watching kids shows is common recommendation (I disagree with it somewhat, but that does not make it not common), so I think people will learn
550.
by watwut 3mo ago
It is backslash against years and years of shows where you are 100% certain characters will be unharmed. Cumulatively, shows lost tension for many of us - there were no stakes whatsoever. You have massive fight, but there is no excitement a
551.
by watwut 3mo ago
We hacked a company and blame the tool! Somehow it is not negligence, but cool! We hacked 3 companies and tripple blame the tool! We are even cooler! We hacked companies amd therefore other peoples models need to be restricted! See, us acci
552.
by watwut 3mo ago
Google dont care about ads on their page. They care about ads on google pages.
553.
by watwut 3mo ago
I read what they write. I see what they pust for. The millionaires were very open about their political goals, their distate for democracy. Republicans are very open about their wish to create white nationalist ethnotstate and their treatme
554.
by watwut 3mo ago
They are not much cheaper, but they are packed with stupid features no one wants
555.
by watwut 3mo ago
I dont call "just anyone" I disagree with that. I call it a specific libertarian millionaires and republican party as is now. Because they fit the definition. And have fascist goals. I disagree with many other people who dont happ
556.
by watwut 3mo ago
The millionaires libertarians consistently support republican party. They are the ones ahifting it to the right and towards fascism.
557.
by watwut 3mo ago
> With all the libertarian millionaires and billionaires swirling around silicon valley Those are pro-surveillance, pro-repair-prevention, pro-fascism. Libertarianism is about your freedom to restrict others, if you are rich and powerful
558.
by watwut 3mo ago
> even though more code is generated than ever, we are not observing an equivalent rise in software quality or usefulness More code produced by a company that has history of low quality ... means more low quality. A company that is unabl
559.
by watwut 3mo ago
> Insightful comment: I want that person to do what I hired them to do, not mess around with code. What does that mean? Who is that person who should not mess with the code?
560.
by watwut 3mo ago
Gotta love OpenAI and Athropic using their screw up to try to restrict competition. And no, it was not "roque ai".
561.
by watwut 3mo ago
> Barely anyone seems to buy NA beer. Not true around me. They are pretty popular. And I stopped drinking them few years ago, when I realized I drink 5-6 a day and it is probably too much.
562.
by watwut 3mo ago
That is weird. Mine are basically infinite.
563.
by watwut 3mo ago
It was because the new people were not white. They were black. The culture was not a factor, no matter how respectability politcs exactly as white they acted, they were black and thus a threat.
564.
by watwut 3mo ago
The first thing to restrict, long before open models, are large closed corporate LLMs. After all, open models are not nearly as dangerous as rich companies.
565.
by watwut 3mo ago
The opposition against data centers is remarkably both side things. Both MAGA opposes it and progressive opposes it. And no, I do not think maga and progressive are the same, but they do in fact both oppose data centers. > Same, for exam
566.
by watwut 3mo ago
Ubers advantage was selling under price for years and being willing to break laws worldwide. And before someone brings up medallions, Uber was selling under price and breaking labor laws where in countries where taxis worked as a normal co
567.
by watwut 3mo ago
I agree but note that frontier companies are NOT selling stochastic generators you are supposed to check. They are selling supposedly trustworthy tool you should use for automation, for learning new stuff and use to replace your experts wit
568.
by watwut 3mo ago
When I listen to some people or to stuff that comes out of the frontier labs, they indeed do sometimes sound like a religious cult talking about deity. I find it disturbing.
569.
by watwut 3mo ago
AI can not fail. It can only be failed. AI can not have limitations. Only the user can be limited.
570.
by watwut 3mo ago
Land to mine from. And yes, you can use robot to beat up the owner and steal it. Then again, you dont need it to be intelligent to be violent.

More ›