Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
wallst07
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
4 ms
·
31.
▲
by
wallst07
27d ago
The irony in your post ... "driven just by some internal feelings" and "violent backing of the state. It's a monopolistic practice abused by wealthy."
32.
▲
by
wallst07
27d ago
I don't see an argument for removing copyright being a good thing other than people wanting other's work for free, not just free to use but free to sell as their own.
33.
▲
by
wallst07
27d ago
"Compared to the economic and human disruptions of shipping most of America's manufacturing jobs overseas since WWII" That didn't happen overnight and was not done out of an immediate law change.
34.
▲
by
wallst07
27d ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_copyright_duration_by_... Might want to check your facts mate.
35.
▲
by
wallst07
28d ago
I'm interested on how you drew the cause/effect of this, is there non-biased sources? Has google said as much, and how does this explain why some models are more accurate?
36.
▲
by
wallst07
28d ago
I don't know, I think this comes down to people that generally live with higher levels of anxiety than others. Now the response may be to call others naive, but where does the anxiety meat the naivety?
37.
▲
by
wallst07
28d ago
So you are horrified every day of living now? I don't get this at all. There are horrifying acts that have occurred since humanity. Whole decades lost to war an millions dead, and Sep 8, 2026 is your example of "horrifying enough
38.
▲
by
wallst07
28d ago
Wouldn't it just as easy to do this on the defense side as well then?
39.
▲
by
wallst07
29d ago
Now do /r/news or /r/politics , instant band for anything not leftist.
40.
▲
by
wallst07
1mo ago
The hardest thing anyone has to deal with is their own thoughts in silence. I suspect most of the people here (including myself) are so addicted to tech and instant access to information it would be unbearable for most. Experience: Meditate
41.
▲
by
wallst07
1mo ago
You are looking at it from the wrong perspective, you are trying to fit "healthy" into your current environment. I think it's the wrong approach. For example: societies that live the longest and are generally the healthiest d
42.
▲
by
wallst07
1mo ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Offensive_realism I think you maybe believing that War would not have happened or there was some other approach without war, ever? I'm sorry but such beliefs are as wishful thinking a
43.
▲
by
wallst07
1mo ago
I'm an idiot, what have we lost exactly? Soft Power?
44.
▲
by
wallst07
1mo ago
It's an opinion just like all the others here... every morning before US wakes up there are a bunch of articles by EU readers for EU readers patting themselves on the back for getting something built without US influence. Inevitably it
45.
▲
by
wallst07
1mo ago
Who is "(Frace)" and what are you talking about? You all need to watch actions more than what people say.
46.
▲
by
wallst07
1mo ago
Claude asks me all the time when it's stuck, what are your prompts? I think some of these anti-claude comments have some face, then I get a peek into how people use them, and it seems all wrong. The tooling is incredibly configurable,
47.
▲
by
wallst07
1mo ago
It's funny you mention this, I've worked for financial type systems where they spend considerable time removing any floats the from the code base. I'll leave it up to the reader to figure out why this may be important.
48.
▲
by
wallst07
1mo ago
Are you talking about this particular topic, or all of them? Are you able to say one positive change current administration has purposefully done? "I agree that it adds little to the conversation" Do you think those comments shoul
49.
▲
by
wallst07
1mo ago
"defending the current administration, at this state, does take a level of bad faith" So every topic regarding current administration is a bad faith argument on the proponent side? Or just this one?
50.
▲
by
wallst07
1mo ago
It's clearly a nuanced topic that requires debate in good-faith, no? So why is it flagged and not debated? If all counter points are flagged, then there is no discourse. The only discourse is all the people who agree with each other.
51.
▲
by
wallst07
1mo ago
It's a spectrum, so we'll just debate what the votes are for. Do I want to see more of them, probably not. Does it deserved to be flagged, absolutely not.
52.
▲
by
wallst07
1mo ago
Does that key work for all VWAG cars? VW, Porsche, Audi..? Thank you!
53.
▲
by
wallst07
1mo ago
"Their job is whatever the government tells them it is" Sounds like authoritarianism.
54.
▲
by
wallst07
1mo ago
So like spam mail, but much less volume?
55.
▲
by
wallst07
1mo ago
1 is flagged 2 Is a statement with a link. What is wrong with it? https://news.gallup.com/poll/652523/americans-endorse-early-... Requiring all voters to provide photo identification at their voting place in orde
56.
▲
by
wallst07
1mo ago
You don't get it, or are not following through. The thread started with why a Conservative wouldn't post here. It's simple, it's not worth getting comments downvoted or flagged for having an unpopular opinion [not nation
57.
▲
by
wallst07
1mo ago
The thread is about general echo chamber / liberal bias though, not specifically on USPS/voter fraud. Any/Every discussion that makes the top page on HN about politics will flood out most of the conservative discussion, furth
58.
▲
by
wallst07
1mo ago
"If you talk to Trump supporters in real life, they are not having nuanced discussions about the state of our country, they are completely tuned out to what is going on." Really, where exactly? I'd say 100% polar opposite. I
59.
▲
by
wallst07
1mo ago
It holds up outside if costal urban areas, there are plenty of places where you can get a 2b/2ba home with garage with that salary. You can't get it in high cost states like CA, NY etc...
60.
▲
by
wallst07
1mo ago
"It's difficult in the US to really not have access to nutritious food." You mean it is easy to get access to nutritious food?
More ›