wakiza33

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by wakiza33 5y ago

   big part of it. and the scrutiny is only going to get more intense
2. 2.▲
   by wakiza33 5y ago

   prioritizes is correct, but in some ways it's not the best descriptor. Google's algos, while advanced, still rely a ton on text to actually tell what the page is about. They need it. If they just relied on other factors (title, li
3. 3.▲
   by wakiza33 5y ago

   there is a smaller niche market. SEMrush is a tool used in the digital marketing industry that is now public and has a multi-billion dollar market cap. It originally started as a search engine. When they didnt gain traction they used the te
4. 4.▲
   by wakiza33 5y ago

   Spam, yes, but Google has also made meaningful shifts that are clearly directed from the top-down. It's much harder now (imo) to get specific results, they've overall started looping SERPs into broad answers. This is def a user-en
5. 5.▲
   by wakiza33 5y ago

   It's all little too perfect isn't it. I think the CIA connection scenario is certainly worth keeping in back of mind.
6. 6.▲
   by wakiza33 5y ago

   That's a fair perspective. The part of it though that is nefarious is that the main segment they have angered is the media. Simply put, the advertising dollars that used to go to newspapers now go to Facebook and Google (because you ca