wajdix

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by wajdix 7y ago

   This is what popped in my head while watching the video!
2. 2.▲
   by wajdix 7y ago

   It's an old company and struggles with a heavy legacy. They would need more than just a CEO to move things around.. It's a mindset and from the outside, IBM seems to me like an old government building that provides services in are
3. 3.▲
   by wajdix 7y ago

   strategically speaking, YES! they are not just promoting a tool among developers/researchers . it's a whole business approach they are taking. But personally I think they are late to the party. Google, Micro$oft, Amazon.. and all
4. 4.▲
   by wajdix 7y ago

   I agree with you. IBM is late to the show and far behind in terms of Data Scientists using their tools and technologies. I myself ( statistician and data scientist) used IBM products for a short period of time in the context of a PoC. my ex
5. 5.▲
   by wajdix 7y ago

   It is just a stunt from IBM to promote their WATSON software. a 200k$ prize is a small price to pay to get dozens of smart people to team up and work/test/enhance your products for free...
6. 6.▲
   by wajdix 9y ago

   Thanks dude :) I had a different opinion as well.. but as you know, nothing is a "fact" unless you have the data to back it.
7. 7.▲
   Linkin Park: Analyzing the causes of death of Rock band members(wajdix.blogspot.com)

   12 points by wajdix 9y ago|2 comments