w4ffl35

10 ms·

61.
by w4ffl35 2y ago
I think it's about 1 year away not 10
62.
by w4ffl35 2y ago
It's rather well known tech accounts.
63.
by w4ffl35 2y ago
Possibly but I've been at it for 20 years - this is the first time I've experienced a drought like this.
64.
by w4ffl35 2y ago
Interesting thanks
65.
by w4ffl35 2y ago
Are jobs being consolidated? Businesses starting but just don't need employees? AI can't do the job yet - is it people with little to no programming skills trying to ChatGPT their way through it? The phenomenon seems to extend bey
66.
by w4ffl35 2y ago
Thanks for responding, but this isn't super helpful - my experience has been that it is next to impossible to get a job interview as of the last year or so. This is anecdotal, but it matches up with what I'm seeing people on soci
67.
Ask HN: Is Programming Dead?
6 points by w4ffl35 2y ago|23 comments
68.
by w4ffl35 2y ago
I've already built things like this. Cool paper but I build things, put them to the side, never write a paper. Sometimes tweet about them. Then I see a paper later about some similar thing and the crowd goes wild. Not a complaint. Idk
69.
by w4ffl35 2y ago
Excellent job. I'm a huge advocate of offline first, privacy forwards apps - consider open sourcing and making it fully offline.
70.
by w4ffl35 3y ago
This person revived an account they haven't touched since 2018 in an attempt to convince ME SPECIFICALLY that there is nothing wrong with the original repo maintainer. They gloss over my arguments, use logical fallacies and are general
71.
by w4ffl35 3y ago
I have a 2080s and build my ai software for it and above. 4090 is a good purchase
72.
by w4ffl35 3y ago
I have no question about the downvotes, bud. You're very verbose. Still not sure why you revived an account you haven't commented with in 6 years just to run cover. I find you to be a highly suspicious individual and I really have
73.
by w4ffl35 3y ago
Thanks, but you assume too much. I outlined the circumstances under which i would require a background check, so you might want to reread. any other questions?
74.
by w4ffl35 3y ago
I am running an open source project. Yes if someone was eager to help and was making changes to things that involved security, I would make them doxx themselves and submit to a background check
75.
by w4ffl35 3y ago
I'm not starting a harmful rumor. People are asking legitimate questions in order to paint the whole picture. Being gaslit is very weird. > I don't stalk your socials I mentioned it because you called my intent into question. W
76.
by w4ffl35 3y ago
Additionally to the guy's above point, replacing him after this incident would complete that play
77.
by w4ffl35 3y ago
Actually my solution as outlined on twitter was to enforce non anon commits, and i stated it is a bad idea to replace him, so try again. And, as stated above, I don't think he's malicious, it's still something that must be co
78.
by w4ffl35 3y ago
Is it normal that when I try to uninstall xz it is trying to install lzma?
79.
by w4ffl35 3y ago
Clearly a human is even better at it.
80.
by w4ffl35 3y ago
Why is a random tweet with no substance on the home page?
81.
by w4ffl35 3y ago
Why the downvotes?
82.
by w4ffl35 3y ago
Very good!
83.
by w4ffl35 3y ago
Why the downvotes on the above comment? I was asked and answered, I'm totally within the hackernews guidelines, down voting my above comment is not within the guidelines. Downvoting out of spite like that is more like what happens on r
84.
by w4ffl35 3y ago
Turning?
85.
by w4ffl35 3y ago
It was predictable, just like the reddit comments section.
86.
by w4ffl35 3y ago
> I find it very difficult to reconcile w4ffl35's rampant individualism (which noticeably characterizes or differentiates the US from that of almost every other country I've been in Collectivist thinking doesn't mean you a
87.
by w4ffl35 3y ago
Objectively though: no one owes anything to society. I can take my education and my creative works to my grave and the Universe doesn't care. Your original argument was from a moral high-ground that doesn't exist. > I'd ha
88.
by w4ffl35 3y ago
Also, the original premise of this entire argument, OP's post: ----- "My content is mine" How much of your education and upbringing did you get for free? You were brought up and educated by society to be in the for
89.
by w4ffl35 3y ago
> You used your alternative education path as a reason to claim you have no obligations to society No, I'm saying that State education is not a reason for obligation and FURTHERMORE I have no State education so assuming that one has
90.
by w4ffl35 3y ago
I'll take this further since you really don't seem to understand what I'm saying: There is no such thing as an inherent ethical or moral obligation to society. There are actions and there are consequences. There are laws and

More ›