w0000t

5 ms·

1.
by w0000t 11y ago
.
2.
by w0000t 11y ago
What!? Size of the array is always known to the programmer in C. In fact, if the programmer wants to get rid of that information, he/she must deliberately do so. Once one does that, the array becomes useless. You also haven't expl
3.
by w0000t 11y ago
Just a note. The quote Eiriksmal posted is from the section: Why would I NOT want to use Arch?
4.
by w0000t 11y ago
Apples, oranges... https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/FAQ#Why_would_I_want_to...
5.
by w0000t 11y ago
In my opinion, if those privacy issues bother you, the first step should be an overview of non-Microsoft operating systems.
6.
by w0000t 11y ago
Yep, C doesn't define that uintptr_t can be modified and converted back to a pointer. It is only for storage.
7.
by w0000t 11y ago
Since watching CITIZENFOUR I've always wondered, why would they bother destroying their laptops, since it is so easy to make and conceal a copy of those documents.
8.
by w0000t 11y ago
False. Mill does not do register renaming. ( Or use "lies". I failed to comprehend you second sentence. ) Here is a talk from one of the designers explaining how it is done: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QGw-cy0y
9.
by w0000t 11y ago
No ordinary registers. Instead you have a FIFO queue( belt ), where every element( register ) is accessible and has a relative address( offset ). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QGw-cy0ylCc&list=PLFls3Q5bBI...
10.
by w0000t 11y ago
All ASCII characters are easily accessible. Your suggestion is a strawman, most coding is in plain text form and is typed. I did a quick calculation a while back. I don't want to repeat it, since I lost the source, but the conclusion w
11.
by w0000t 11y ago
I also wish C++ had a large Standard library. Including <vector>, just works, you don't even have to think about it. Now imagine doing the same for <sound> or <window>.
12.
by w0000t 11y ago
And prevent learning? No, what you need to do, is to learn whatever you enjoy, as much as you want in any direction, but recognize your limited knowledge in the field and act accordingly.
13.
by w0000t 11y ago
So the sound is completely artificial, constructed by you? ( It is very convincing. )
14.
by w0000t 11y ago
Actually 'b' is at a completely wrong position( on a ordinary keyboard ). It is inaccessible for both hand, without moving your wrist which causes strain. I have globally remapped 'b' to the right of 'l'. It fe
15.
by w0000t 11y ago
http://physics.stackexchange.com/a/186203
16.
by w0000t 11y ago
I wouldn't call it Ether, since that would imply some absolute reference frame.
17.
by w0000t 11y ago
Yes, I did. But so far I haven't been regularly checking printf return value. :-( I wonder if checking the result of every printf or asserting it, depending on the circumstances, would reduce the amount of time spent on writing+debuggi
18.
by w0000t 11y ago
That sort of thing is actually a completely valid approach. You made a small mistake, since fprintf and printf call the same underlying code, the error handling should be either log the error in any way still available, and then depending o
19.
by w0000t 11y ago
Thank you. Yes, I meant steganography.
20.
by w0000t 11y ago
That is not what OP is talking about. You cannot get different information out of the same chunk of encrypted data. That would basically make infinite compression. What the methods you mentioned are doing, is hiding information in places wh
21.
by w0000t 11y ago
Storing the different information in the same place is impossible. You could use stenography but then anyone with access to the program/source will immediately discover the deceit. You can use what hiq is suggesting, https:/&#x2F
22.
by w0000t 11y ago
http://www.dwavesys.com/press-releases/d-wave-systems-breaks... This announcement, claims: Every additional qubit doubles the search space of the processor. At 1000 qubits, the new processor considers 2^1000 possibili
23.
by w0000t 11y ago
The problem is it needs to be applied to every function that returns a value. And I'm pretty sure you can't apply it to C library functions. Gcc seriously needs a global flag for this.
24.
by w0000t 11y ago
Why did you give up?
25.
by w0000t 11y ago
This is also addressed in the article. Reading the title is not enough, you have to read the article.
26.
by w0000t 11y ago
You missed this paragraph, which occurs in the first 10% of the article. The second caveat is that the class of functions which can be approximated in the way described are the continuous functions. If a function is discontinuous, i.e., ma
27.
by w0000t 11y ago
Can you name the those compilers?
28.
by w0000t 11y ago
That is a pretty naive point of view. That amount of know-how, and I'm assuming he knows much more that has presented, is normal for someone who has been programming for 15+ years straight. If you find yourself still seriously programm
29.
by w0000t 11y ago
Very convincing. Just by skimming over the text( finding key phrases and words ), I would be fooled into thinking it is a real Reddit thread. On average, only by reading at least two complete sentences it is possible to determine that the w
30.
by w0000t 11y ago
Don't you have to spawn at the coordinates 0,0, or at the so called "spawn point". How did you start at 5000+? I'm assuming you used an offline version.

More ›