vsareto

48 ms·

211.
by vsareto 4y ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nirvana_fallacy maybe?
212.
by vsareto 4y ago
>It's pretty fascinating to consider the implications and whether that's something we'll want, bc it may soon be possible. I wouldn't be surprised if it told people to take some path of least resistance to $10+ millio
213.
by vsareto 4y ago
Nothing's going to fix that but having more doctors around. Going from a recorded transcript to a summary note, extracted structured data, and diagnostic codes is a big time saver.
214.
by vsareto 4y ago
>Our efficiency work has several parallel workstreams to improve organizational efficiency, dramatically increase developer productivity and tooling, optimize distributed work, garbage collect unnecessary processes, and more. All the too
215.
by vsareto 4y ago
Baseless speculation, but I wouldn't be surprised if some withdrawals are just moving money around to spread risk. High confidence, but high withdrawals?
216.
by vsareto 4y ago
AI will probably be boring eventually since it's a large umbrella. Even if you scope down to LLMs and NLP, gluing those to work with your stuff in interesting ways will still seem boring compared to publishing papers. What I never got
217.
by vsareto 4y ago
>That is suddenly no longer true. This newfound flexibility has triggered the “Great Resignation”, where people prioritized other factors over professional considerations. Many people are voting with their feet and moving away from tradi
218.
by vsareto 4y ago
There are plenty of other jobs that anyone with a pulse could do and make more than fast food. But of course those jobs make total economic sense, right?
219.
by vsareto 4y ago
Burry got lucky but has been wrong more recently. He’s basically an investment doomposter.
220.
by vsareto 4y ago
Get ready for Pandemic 2: Banking Flu
221.
by vsareto 4y ago
Software really has inadequate training. People get very diverse training experiences and that can be a source of friction between developers at different qualities and competencies. It also moves so quickly that things don't settle an
222.
by vsareto 4y ago
TBH we'd all like offices a lot more if they had one person offices in them. That's my big chip-on-the-shoulder: we went from personal offices -> open workspaces -> remote -> back to the office in the name of productivity
223.
by vsareto 4y ago
Add “Let’s think step by step” with the math problem and see if you get something different
224.
by vsareto 4y ago
https://www.reddit.com/gallery/11kzn5v
225.
by vsareto 4y ago
DAN works https://gist.github.com/coolaj86/6f4f7b30129b0251f61fa7baaa8...
226.
by vsareto 4y ago
I feel like you can compensate with more complicated prompts. Or even different prompt categories (like negative prompts, but for programming it might be a list of constraints). Like this interface: https://github.com/AUTOMA
227.
by vsareto 4y ago
The regulation was vague, so now you have a situation where two sides are interpreting things differently: >She said: “The regulation at the time stated that a wheel bearing was bad when it had ‘visible seepage’. But that was very vague,
228.
by vsareto 4y ago
How does he simultaneously believe "only the top 1% do Agile well" and "Software development practices have steadily improved year by year without government help."? A lot of the industry is self-regulating. Self-regulat
229.
by vsareto 4y ago
That’s fucking ludicrous
230.
by vsareto 4y ago
People can claim to be seniors because the gates for getting that title are pretty permissive. But even if you had the conviction to re-evaluate yourself ("do I deserve to be a senior engineer?"), you'll find tons of opinions
231.
by vsareto 4y ago
Feels like an Architect interview more than a Senior interview though
232.
by vsareto 4y ago
>Instead, we're starting from a place of societal distrust, which is probably more helpful in preventing rogue AI than a lot of technical solutions would be. A confounding factor for AI's success would be a scientific replicati
233.
by vsareto 4y ago
I have no higher hopes that AI products will be regulated any better than cryptocurrencies. Fundamentally they both operate at breakneck speeds which regulators have proven they can only, at best, react to damage being done. Maybe they surp
234.
by vsareto 4y ago
>Notably, chain of thought (CoT) prompting, a recent technique for eliciting complex multi-step reasoning through step-by-step answer examples, achieved the state-of-the-art performances in arithmetics and symbolic reasoning, difficult s
235.
by vsareto 4y ago
It's nice to imagine, but tech puts its quality gates around developers. That means developers will end up having to prove they are better than a manager-using-ChatGPT, rather than managers having to prove anything.
236.
by vsareto 4y ago
It would be nice to have, but probably too much dev/design/QA effort for the payoff. Then you have to consider the confusion of presenting two different appearances of the game to the audience. This seems like it should be solved
237.
by vsareto 4y ago
You wouldn't want all participants having the same level of knowledge, so you compartmentalize and change the information. The juicy stuff that indicts you is kept at a higher level, while the lower ranks are given different versions t
238.
by vsareto 4y ago
Farming as a whole is probably just going to have to become a sunk cost center for economies. Sure, no one will make a profit and we take money from high margin industries and move it into farming, but you also won't have food shortage
239.
by vsareto 4y ago
That's possible today without AI though, so, if it's a real worry, why are we still teaching people the science to engineer a deadly virus?
240.
by vsareto 4y ago
Proper prompt engineering would likely involve finding emergent properties like this: https://github.com/dair-ai/Prompt-Engineering-Guide/blob/mai... (this is claimed for LLMs, not proven) It only seems like

More ›