vsareto

83 ms·

871.
by vsareto 6y ago
>C#/F#/.NET - No (complex runtime) - No (fragile bundling) Dunno if I agree with the second column. .NET Core is cross platform now, but I'm not sure what fragile bundling really means here, but it definitely is portable w
872.
by vsareto 6y ago
Lots of folks about to find out that #TweetFleet has a lot of EVE online content
873.
by vsareto 6y ago
If anyone ever tells you directly that you fall into one of these categories, please laugh in their face and quit ASAP. This is dehumanizing. You're being categorized for organizational purposes. It dictates how to interact and manage
874.
by vsareto 6y ago
There seems to be a bigger problem lurking: surely it's better to instead write as little code as possible for only absolutely necessary programs. The program that doesn't run contributes the least amount of suffering. That of cou
875.
by vsareto 6y ago
>the larger point is that you are willing to do what is needed They seem to be unable to organize and delegate work effectively even when it's needed and instead rely on polyglot-engineers to bridge that gap by overloading their res
876.
by vsareto 6y ago
It's great to know that we still have no idea what we're all doing in tech.
877.
by vsareto 6y ago
If there's one thing technology is good at disrupting, it's tradition
878.
by vsareto 6y ago
>and they can not audit every possible software release. Do less frequent, more meaningful releases. Grow and invest in security talent. Move slow and polish things. Plus infosec is definitely not taking everyone in with a proven interes
879.
by vsareto 6y ago
IMO Solarpunk is cool, but it's not going to offer many realistic social lessons or warnings like cyberpunk does because it still relies on globalisation, huge logistics networks, and large factories to support the lifestyle and direct
880.
by vsareto 6y ago
>Tweet: Thats infuriating, misleading and probably illegal Anyone know what is potentially illegal about this?
881.
by vsareto 6y ago
These days you can just have mobile (random) pentesting platforms https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DMNSvHswljM
882.
by vsareto 6y ago
>The counterpoint to this is the amount of resumes I've had to read and subsequent interviews I've had to sit on from "seniors" or "principals" that they themselves haven't gone fully into the weeds on
883.
by vsareto 6y ago
I don't think stage fright explains an XML document as a solution to a priority queue. I'm betting it was something like this though: https://www.chegg.com/homework-help/questions-and-answers/pr...
884.
by vsareto 6y ago
>having a professional business negotiator working for you is life & career changing. What are the things you did or the things you had that made that opportunity available to you?
885.
by vsareto 6y ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24745471 I'm starting to think it was more than just sitcoms
886.
by vsareto 6y ago
That's definitely a human connection desert.
887.
by vsareto 6y ago
I think the key disagreement here is that you don't agree that a stock market staying high during a pandemic due to government intervention would attract more active investors, and those active investors can make less mistakes because
888.
by vsareto 6y ago
If you get lucky gains starting out doing riskier things like WSB does, you might be more inclined to keep that style until you take some losses. And if you're swept up in WSB's fun, you'll probably end up taking more losses.
889.
by vsareto 6y ago
People that compare the two outcomes will decide to become new active investors that fuels what the parent to my comment is talking about
890.
by vsareto 6y ago
>but there’s a never ending supply of people who think they can beat the odds and investors who want to believe. Based on how the stock market didn't die during the pandemic vs. how many people lost their jobs, I'd say they are
891.
by vsareto 6y ago
Yep, fat shaming doesn't work because the rich bully the poor all the time and that definitely hasn't changed anything
892.
by vsareto 6y ago
I don't think there is. This is mostly political in that businesses ought to be keeping up wages because that's the right thing to do. If the supply of labor is such that they always have access to lower-paid workers though, there
893.
by vsareto 6y ago
I'm just saying: a demotivated or lied-to worker resembles slackers pretty closely. I think it's less about personal flaws than we think.
894.
by vsareto 6y ago
Companies have been milking workers as well. It's not surprising it comes back to them.
895.
by vsareto 6y ago
Any of those countries could just get someone hired at Apple for that
896.
by vsareto 6y ago
>but it also arbitrarily eliminates a significant chunk of good candidates. I think they know that and they're okay with it because they have the volume and cash. I think they routinely tell you to try again.
897.
by vsareto 6y ago
Being less reliant on creds helps newer folks, while more senior folks have to maintain that ability for the sole purpose of interviewing. To me, if you can't substitute a verified credential or experience in place of a technical inter
898.
by vsareto 6y ago
>I guess that's part of the thrill. Yeah looking forward to the day where passing unit tests results in a Neuralink-induced orgasm
899.
If doctors were interviewed like software developers(old.reddit.com)
2 points by vsareto 6y ago|0 comments
900.
by vsareto 6y ago
>Microsoft can only track via Windows Office 365? The thing that a whole host of businesses rely upon for email, spreadsheets, presentations? MS has just as much of an opportunity as Amazon does for spying on its cloud customers through

More ›