Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
vsareto
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
85 ms
·
841.
▲
by
vsareto
6y ago
That's another thing that was bugging me: this is pretty easy level stuff for an SRE position from what I know. The other surprise was new grads being directly hired to SRE positions and it was my impression you needed professional ski
842.
▲
by
vsareto
6y ago
This is just positioned weirdly. They use it for on-boarding, which means you already got the job without knowing it or only partially knowing it, so it's not a hard requirement. The real requirement is the ability to learn. But if tha
843.
▲
by
vsareto
6y ago
Could you actually get an SRE job if you went through this?
844.
▲
by
vsareto
6y ago
Maybe they can relax the work/life balance now
845.
▲
by
vsareto
6y ago
I kind of agree with their reasoning, the exception being when you can have a lot of complicated looping/control flow breaks or transient variables close to their usage. Seeing 'array[i][j][k]' is never fun.
846.
▲
by
vsareto
6y ago
https://mobile.twitter.com/unrealchill/status/12834181367384... Nice, a bunch of evidence from an eBay body cam.
847.
▲
by
vsareto
6y ago
Predicating this on surprise is the problem. We still would have used computers for data entry, storage, and transmission even though we know humans could do that because they're simply superior than paper and typewriters in most ways.
848.
▲
by
vsareto
6y ago
Which is implying there can be nothing wrong with any company and it's always the employee's fault when it doesn't work out.
849.
▲
by
vsareto
6y ago
Global average or people-who-work-at-FAANG average? The frame of reference here is important, otherwise average is pretty meaningless since we have no objective list of what an average developer consists of.
850.
▲
by
vsareto
6y ago
NGL, I'd jump through hoops for 250k + other compensation Part of why this has stuck around for so long is that so many people are willing to do that because it's a life-altering amount of money
851.
▲
by
vsareto
6y ago
I mean, it wouldn't hurt to know how to do all of this, plus all the data structures & algorithms stuff, plus all major and minor details about your language and environment of choice, plus anything else that someone deems importan
852.
▲
by
vsareto
6y ago
DBs can have debuggers and breakpoints, but they do not come anywhere close to something like Visual Studio debugging C# code. Of course, many programming languages also do not have a debugging quality-of-life compared to Visual Studio.
853.
▲
by
vsareto
6y ago
Plus the purpose of a house generally does not change much. If you buy one, you're not going to turn it into a bar one year, then turn it into a candle shop the next. The requirements usually stay the same. Some business apps do need t
854.
▲
by
vsareto
6y ago
>But there are lots of other ways–the key observation is that as long as you are right, being misunderstood by most people is a strength not a weakness. You and a small group of rebels get the space to solve an important problem that mig
855.
▲
by
vsareto
6y ago
Even better, just make a beer hat add on for your VR headset
856.
▲
by
vsareto
6y ago
On one hand, you're shipping stuff which is what you're paid to do. On the other, why not avoid the all-nighter and work 2-3 hours per day? At least then you won't have to lie.
857.
▲
by
vsareto
6y ago
>I'd use something else for grabbing the entire market. "obliterate" maybe? "monopolize" works well
858.
▲
by
vsareto
6y ago
Few companies are going to pay them differently for that effort, so they'll just likely leave. This situation is probably long-term worse for morale because there's no collective sense of accomplishment and instead everyone's
859.
▲
by
vsareto
6y ago
I'm going to be a radical and say it really doesn't matter any more. We've just gotten used to them not being accurate. If your progress bar implementation is getting things wrong, you can probably just replace it with a load
860.
▲
by
vsareto
6y ago
I swear, front end just invents this stuff to keep us all confused :(
861.
▲
by
vsareto
6y ago
Or maybe someone told the developer to implement a backdoor and this was the only way they thought they could do it? Can someone explain what we get by assuming the Chinese are just so inept at technology (they aren't) that we give the
862.
▲
by
vsareto
6y ago
I knew it was one of those stupid razors that people post smugly about
863.
▲
by
vsareto
6y ago
He doesn't demonstrate an attack over the internet in this article, but this makes me think he did investigate it from a remote attacker perspective vs. local network: >So what does that get us from the perspective of a remote attac
864.
▲
by
vsareto
6y ago
You don't need XSS, that's not interesting at all. You can get the admin password from an insecure page, and then there's also a page to run commands as root.
865.
▲
by
vsareto
6y ago
Read this: https://james-clee.com/2020/04/18/multiple-wavlink-vulnerabi... >Low and behold, there was my super secret password in plain text, with the admin username in plain text, on a page that requires
866.
▲
by
vsareto
6y ago
I don't like cybernews.com or their video, so here's the researcher's page with details: https://james-clee.com/2020/04/18/multiple-wavlink-vulnerabi...
867.
▲
by
vsareto
6y ago
>I think (and hope) this era of unfettered partying and bro-culture capitalism is finally coming to an end This was Wall Street banks before tech. I think the culture will just shift to something else.
868.
▲
by
vsareto
6y ago
No, the momentum of left-wing media covering Trump is going to swing to the other side with right-wing media covering Biden. It's a perpetual, cyclical attention grabber. It won't go away.
869.
▲
by
vsareto
6y ago
You could just live at a higher altitude.
870.
▲
by
vsareto
6y ago
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3901353/ I thought the free radical/antioxidant stuff was done with?
More ›