Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
vsareto
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
28 ms
·
301.
▲
by
vsareto
4y ago
As far as growing speed, hopefully some work can be done to make this a relatively quick growing method: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4406943/
302.
▲
by
vsareto
4y ago
Musk is basically trying to be an Old Republic Sith Lord and filtering for apprentices. All he has to do is throw down a gauntlet and it'll attract people who like running gauntlets. This particular gauntlet is software engineering. Ma
303.
▲
by
vsareto
4y ago
This guy isn't a lifter though, and 235lbs at 160lbs bodyweight is really good for someone who isn't.
304.
▲
by
vsareto
4y ago
I know this isn't any kind of silver bullet, but if you have these kinds of time constraints, wouldn't building your solution on a real time OS make more sense?
305.
▲
by
vsareto
4y ago
>advanced encryption Now I really want to know the DoD's definition of basic vs. advanced encryption. Is there a middle tier, like average encryption?
306.
▲
by
vsareto
4y ago
This is really a historical article with a clickbait headline. You can't practically replace guns or revert society to bows.
307.
▲
by
vsareto
4y ago
> It's shocking how many people don't have the ability to organize their thoughts. It's organized for them, but not for others. This skill is not intuitive to learn, so it shouldn't be shocking.
308.
▲
by
vsareto
4y ago
>I know git can be tricky but it cannot be that difficult to teach people from non technical departments add, commit and push and then show maybe one person from each department how to solve conflicts Nah, that's going to be a craps
309.
▲
by
vsareto
4y ago
Some people can maintain the complex code they write but might be viewed as spaghetti to someone else. You can't trust always trust someone's call when they say code is unmaintainable.
310.
▲
by
vsareto
4y ago
I'd consider 20 years a good run and then move to something else. That excitement could still be in technology though. You could try digital art of some kind (2D or 3D) or get into hardware or embedded development. Maybe you need to fi
311.
▲
by
vsareto
4y ago
Meritocracy is biased for people with money, especially if you were born with significant sums.
312.
▲
by
vsareto
4y ago
Bad food and portion sizes carry most of the blame for obesity. You can be a gym nut and still addicted to technology though.
313.
▲
by
vsareto
4y ago
We can't if we keep running a society that's working people into a minimal life. Reduce work and living expenses to give people back some time and energy to actually pick up something more complicated than social feeds or digital
314.
▲
by
vsareto
4y ago
I think people are just surprised that it takes so much work because we thought things would get easier as time went on. It's actually the opposite though as more technologies have been developed. There's way more things involved
315.
▲
by
vsareto
4y ago
Investment bankers are just being exploited though. I don't think they fight against it because of the payoff.
316.
▲
by
vsareto
4y ago
Being available is still useful to your employer on some level. Even if you are watching videos, you can close it the minute you get a ping that needs your attention. The only completely unproductive state is if you're doing nothing fo
317.
▲
by
vsareto
4y ago
There's two things I find worth considering as maybe-wrong: 1) non-public investment opportunities in combination with tax-free status 2) no sanity threshold to collect some taxes after your Roth balance becomes large enough 1 is maybe
318.
▲
by
vsareto
4y ago
It's hard for a stoic mindset to pave over the fact that you're only working a job because you have to. You'd see less of that if we have a society that gives a decent standard of living without having to work (ever), but eve
319.
▲
by
vsareto
4y ago
More likely non-veterans trying to sound serious
320.
▲
by
vsareto
4y ago
>Engineering: How to increase speed and quality > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yL_m10CT6bIVsvSfjsCcm_Q4... >You are now likely thinking: "Matt, there just aren't enough senior engineers i
321.
▲
by
vsareto
4y ago
Usually people get it if it already is down.
322.
▲
by
vsareto
4y ago
>You pay for value. There is a ceiling - the company pays what it thinks it can get away with, you accept pay according to what you can get. It's almost never according to the monetary value you provide.
323.
▲
by
vsareto
4y ago
If you drink neither and choose water, then it'll really come down. Bonus: you'll feel better
324.
▲
by
vsareto
4y ago
I agree with culling 'just' because it rarely adds clarity, but I don't get the emotional impact others are having when they hear it. This blog post is trying to establish that its use definitely means something bad and conde
325.
▲
by
vsareto
4y ago
I'm all for cutting this out with medical advice and such (unsolicited advice, and importantly wrong advice), but this example annoys me: >You look at some graphs and error messages. It’s easy (once again, I speak from experience) t
326.
▲
by
vsareto
4y ago
Fair warning about this Mastodon behavior that can lead to embarrassment/leaks as new people start to use it: https://mastodon.social/@mmasnick/109299348553543784
327.
▲
by
vsareto
4y ago
House Report: https://oversight.house.gov/sites/democrats.oversight.house....
328.
▲
House Analysis: Corporations Use Cover of Inflation to Raise Prices Excessively
(commondreams.org)
4 points
by
vsareto
4y ago
|
1 comments
329.
▲
by
vsareto
4y ago
>Passive investing has removed price discovery from the equity markets. The simple theses and the models that get people into sectors, factors, indexes, or ETFs and mutual funds mimicking those strategies — these do not require the secur
330.
▲
by
vsareto
4y ago
Those tradeoffs don't seem worth paying thousands to tens of thousands extra to me though. If vans were more competitive in price with trucks/trailers, I'd be all for it, but right now it seems massively inflated. It seems li
More ›