Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
vsareto
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
28 ms
·
331.
▲
by
vsareto
4y ago
I don't get how any of this is better than buying a decent truck and tow camper. Truck prices are likewise insane in the US but offer more utility if you decide you want to stop living out of a camper. A lot of this seems dumb but it w
332.
▲
by
vsareto
4y ago
I'd be suspicious of those claims with that job, but hotel shuttles are a great way to network in a large city near a busy airport.
333.
▲
by
vsareto
4y ago
I'd guess only a small portion of people actually care for that feature. People are maybe better at remembering what's in their files by name alone than we give them credit, or willing to just look through things to find them, or
334.
▲
by
vsareto
4y ago
This is a big list to tackle from zero. Chances are you’re employable if you get through a third or half of this list. You’re probably senior if you can do all of it.
335.
▲
by
vsareto
4y ago
If you do this, go ask your manager for a raise for doing another role on top of your current one. Don't give away your superpowers for free.
336.
▲
by
vsareto
4y ago
>It's just so disrespectful I think you're seeking that out. Someone more relaxed might just respond with "what's it doing?" and let them share the details. Some people chat over messengers like they talk in real
337.
▲
by
vsareto
4y ago
An extra 600/day is incredibly easy to get with American food and habits
338.
▲
by
vsareto
4y ago
I don't like how this article wants you to waste time getting tripped up and frustrated with basic problems just for the sake of figuring it out on your own. There are major companies doing research on wheels in a variety of contexts a
339.
▲
by
vsareto
4y ago
>On every single occasion at every organisation I have worked for I have discovered great disparity between the user's desires and problems and what is communicated through the layers. This is a quality problem of the people doing t
340.
▲
by
vsareto
4y ago
Developers just need to understand everything because we need developers to do everything and meet all deadlines. We wouldn't dare consider a support role that could troubleshoot it because then there would be no point to having develo
341.
▲
by
vsareto
4y ago
This is just deceptive as you're saying it's optional but rejecting people behind the scenes. Stop wasting peoples' time and just mark it as required.
342.
▲
by
vsareto
4y ago
If you can get the work done, it's not unethical. Sounds like they weren't getting it done though: >(their downfall was neither of them were meeting productivity expectations, not getting their work done)
343.
▲
by
vsareto
4y ago
TBH if you trained with lots of data you’re not supposed to use (no consent), you probably should be forced to release things. You shouldn’t get the agency to withhold work if you didn’t respect others’ choices about not contributing to AI.
344.
▲
by
vsareto
4y ago
Doing anything remotely perceived as treasonous seems dumb. More than likely they are acting closer to spies for the US (against SA) in these positions.
345.
▲
by
vsareto
4y ago
That's usually what happens: assigned product people to engineering teams who focus on what the engineering team works on, then they report one level higher. You shouldn't be seeing a new decision-making Product person every month
346.
▲
by
vsareto
4y ago
>Good software engineers are characterized by determination and persistence, thanks to which they can deliver effective and intuitive solutions to end users. They must have a rich imagination, be up to date with industry trends, read a l
347.
▲
by
vsareto
4y ago
TBH even the foundation has changed dramatically. It's hard to convince me we have rock solid foundations in a quickly changing industry. Most of the feedback loop is if you can get jobs of ever higher compensation. If that loop stops
348.
▲
by
vsareto
4y ago
The basics give you enough to be dangerous, but cloud stuff has become complex enough to require dedicated people to do it well. I'd prefer to hire someone dedicated to that and just let them work part time when the environment is simp
349.
▲
by
vsareto
4y ago
Now get gtihub.com
350.
▲
by
vsareto
4y ago
There's more scrutiny of shorter-term stays, so you can't just leetcode yourself into a job.
351.
▲
by
vsareto
4y ago
I think it comes down to team/company preference. I would really prefer a culture that allowed (at least) 2-8 hours for a larger code review of features. That way you can block time out for it and digest things. A company culture has t
352.
▲
by
vsareto
4y ago
This list will impede velocity by quite a lot, especially with coming up with and implementing Plan B's
353.
▲
by
vsareto
4y ago
This only seems like it started in 2021. Up until then, those arguments were sound. It's worth reconsideration if this is now the trend, but can you really defend the position that you thought those arguments were suspect because you k
354.
▲
by
vsareto
4y ago
Just like there are loads of average developers, there are loads of average companies. You can get lucky and work at all great companies in your career. Most of us will not have enough jobs in our lives to get a representative sample. There
355.
▲
by
vsareto
4y ago
These archetypes seem like they should have different job titles except for maybe Solver. Additionally, what differentiates a Staff Engineer who's a Team Lead archetype from someone that's a TeamLead? Overloading the Staff Enginee
356.
▲
by
vsareto
4y ago
I'm saying they're not going to see the logic of saving time with better equipment when they're complaining about people slacking off remotely.
357.
▲
by
vsareto
4y ago
>The important thing is that employers understand that slow computers cost them a lot of money when they hobble developers with them. Sadly, that's not going to fly these days with those same employers thinking people slack off more
358.
▲
by
vsareto
4y ago
>At least today society is notably, collectively, smarter. Intelligence has gone up, Wisdom has declined
359.
▲
by
vsareto
4y ago
Of course the folks that hired those people are going to be like "we bring great talent to this company" when they get asked what their added value is
360.
▲
by
vsareto
4y ago
Optimists can too easily ignore the potential consequences of their actions chasing success at all costs. We're still in a society where a balance is best. Having a pessimist is great if you don't let them completely stop you.
More ›