vore

54 ms·

661.
by vore 4y ago
Why don't you take a look for yourself before getting mad at your strawman? https://girlswhocode.com/assets/downloads/craft-prod/downloa...
662.
by vore 4y ago
In practice, you see a lot of these self-professed Judeo-Christian moralizers engage in irresponsible individualist behavior so I don't think paying lip service to religious morality is really effective here either. The overriding fact
663.
by vore 4y ago
Of course. Quality of education highly depends on your family's economic background -- the worst off you are, the lower your chances of leaving poverty are. We can cherry-pick the success stories for those who did escape the poverty tr
664.
by vore 4y ago
Sidestepping your culture war flaming, this is just a race to the bottom. Are we supposed to give employers are free pass to work someone to the bone just because they're poor? Surely we can also acknowledge that, that while it's
665.
by vore 4y ago
Your solution to fixing the problem is... hoping you have a successful child?
666.
by vore 4y ago
drunk driving may kill a lot of people, but it also helps a lot of people get to work on time, so, it;s impossible to say if its bad or not,
667.
by vore 4y ago
Paul Krugman literally wrote a notorious article about this. https://slate.com/business/1997/03/in-praise-of-cheap-labor....
668.
by vore 4y ago
Logically if you want to rip out work from the client you would put more work into the backend? I don't understand what you're getting at. CRUD may be fast on the server side, but if the client is performing a complex workflow of
669.
by vore 4y ago
The documentation you linked itself says to structure your code such that you are not taking dependencies inappropriately, not to omit bona fide dependencies from the dependencies array: Specifying [count] as a list of dependencies wo
670.
by vore 4y ago
I feel like another alternative in this space is to use GraphQL: while it does introduce complexity in terms of query handling, it does allow each frontend to more precisely query the data model and avoids having to tightly couple the front
671.
by vore 4y ago
Huh? react-hooks/exhaustive-deps does exactly that: it statically infers dependencies and is very noisy if you forget one, and the React team recommends that you always have it on. In fact, the React docs have this to say, right in the
672.
by vore 4y ago
Learn the theory, not the framework.
673.
by vore 4y ago
Why not? Having to manually manage the dependency array is tedious: in fact, not specifying a required dependency is a logic error anyway, so having the compiler do it is basically preferred in all cases.
674.
by vore 4y ago
Could you elaborate on this?
675.
by vore 4y ago
I don't really understand this argument: if GitHub allows hosting things that completely disclaim warranty and people are using things from GitHub, don't you effectively have this "tossing a blueprint into the world" pro
676.
by vore 4y ago
Or maybe it's useful for when you do get frustrated and can't find the mouse cursor :)
677.
by vore 4y ago
% is defined as (mostly) a remainder operator. I don't think you want to change the semantics of division itself.
678.
by vore 4y ago
Isn't pickle just as bad if not worse? There's no guarantee that the unpickled object has the right shape either, AND it can arbitrarily execute code while unpickling.
679.
by vore 4y ago
One thing that's not mentioned is that pickled data is effectively fossilized once you've pickled it. If you want to change the layout of a class and have objects unpickle correctly, it can be an ordeal, as objects are unpickled b
680.
by vore 4y ago
This is what incremental garbage collection does: you don't necessarily have to do it all at once, you can make incremental progress as needed.
681.
by vore 4y ago
In China at least, the GFW can detect tunneled SSH traffic and cut it off.
682.
by vore 4y ago
If you failed to clarify in your original post, it really does look like it's not material to the story: we don't have the context so reasonably people are going to ask why you even brought it up. No need to get so indignant about
683.
by vore 4y ago
Sadly I don't think Clauncher or Clawitzer can have Water Absorb :(
684.
by vore 4y ago
Your browser will run WebAssembly about as happily as it will run JavaScript. What's the distinction here?
685.
by vore 4y ago
> If he doesn’t owe us anything, then we also don’t owe him anything. Perhaps he’d like to take back his code and the rest of the world can take back all the opportunities and other things he’s been given In exchange. I feel like this is
686.
by vore 4y ago
Assume you're having to ship a large single release bundling the code of multiple integrating teams: a bug in one of those teams' code will likely delay the release of the entire bundle: bugs are inevitable and no amount of better
687.
by vore 4y ago
You're running untrusted binaries anyway in the end, so I don't think this is anything more than a neat party trick.
688.
by vore 4y ago
Why? If it's over TLS you can trust it's being served by the owner of the website. You're having to trust the person who wrote the script anyway. And before anyone says "I'm going to inspect the shell script before
689.
by vore 4y ago
Your last sentence isn't relevant to the article at all and is just flamebait speculation.
690.
by vore 4y ago
I think on the contrary, it's important to build software that's resilient to random reboots: you can't control things like losing power or your CPU failing, so the less toil you have to manage around that the better.

More ›