vor_

7 ms·

91.
by vor_ 5mo ago
> No. AI is a must for software development. It's non-negotiable. ???
92.
by vor_ 6mo ago
Because it's funny that The Onion will be taking over InfoWars.
93.
by vor_ 6mo ago
> When DJT talked about cancelling the Dept of Edu, I got ahold of all the teachers I knew and asked them what impact it would have, and their response was mostly that they would lose their school lunch benefits. Not the most convincing
94.
by vor_ 6mo ago
Sounds like a great way to avoid alcohol addiction, prevent drunk driving deaths, and save countless generations from being negatively impacted in one way or another by alcohol.
95.
by vor_ 6mo ago
Using a client-server model for single-player allows it to lean on that system for replaying state changes.
96.
by vor_ 6mo ago
> But it's also been anti-Javascript, anti-cloud, anti-social-media, anti-crypto, anti-React, and so on. It was never any of these things, and you're misremembering if you think it was. There's never been a mono-opinion he
97.
by vor_ 6mo ago
You've been complaining about Hacker News for years.
98.
by vor_ 6mo ago
When you use the term "luddite" in the way you do, you reveal that you aren't aware of who the Luddites actually were. Luddites weren't anti-technology; many of them were experts at using advanced machinery. What they op
99.
by vor_ 6mo ago
Who still buys from iTunes? This is likely bot-driven.
100.
by vor_ 6mo ago
It's definitely still hypocrisy.
101.
by vor_ 7mo ago
I'm sorry, but you're acting obtuse if you pretend you don't know why they're being called that.
102.
by vor_ 7mo ago
This is total misinformation.
103.
by vor_ 7mo ago
That's cringy.
104.
by vor_ 7mo ago
I wouldn't characterize the story as a hit piece; the misquotes didn't distort his position. What happened is the LLM accurately summarized his position, but they weren't actually his words in the quotes.
105.
by vor_ 7mo ago
> How many "I deleted the prod database" stories have you seen? Humans do this too. Humans do it accidentally.
106.
by vor_ 7mo ago
> If you actually read the words used in Steam AI survey you'll know Steam has completely caved in for AI-gen code as well. And if you actually read the article, you'd see it addressed that. > Yeah, exactly. And LLM help dev
107.
by vor_ 7mo ago
> It disappoints me that technologists are so skeptical of this technology rather than exploring what it is and why it might be different to what exists today. It's fun! thats the takeaway: it's FUN. It's most likely fun f
108.
by vor_ 7mo ago
> Also - study the code of the likes of Carmack. Consider that he produced the likes of the quake engines in only a couple of years. Reflect long and hard on the raw simplicity of a lot of that code. There's a tendency to ascribe th
109.
by vor_ 7mo ago
You have a pattern of bringing up immigration in response to stories or comments that don't mention it.
110.
by vor_ 7mo ago
Are you really reviewing 30-40k lines of code a day?
111.
by vor_ 8mo ago
And that divide has been around for much longer than twenty years.
112.
by vor_ 8mo ago
I take issue with this. Knowledge like connecting to a remote server via SSH or explaining what DNS is have ALWAYS been niche topics. The article claims these are things you learned in the first week of "seriously engaging" with a
113.
by vor_ 8mo ago
Respectfully, I find this to be an unwarranted positive reaction to have toward this situation. What other action could Ars possibly take as a journalistic business? The quotes are indisputably false. This is hardly a praise-worthy action t
114.
by vor_ 8mo ago
What alternative action could he possibly take? He's owning up to something indisputable.
115.
by vor_ 8mo ago
That's a poor mea culpa. It begins with a preamble attempting to garner sympathy from the reader before it gets to the acknowledgement of the error, which is a sleight-of-hand attempt to soften its severity.
116.
by vor_ 8mo ago
Several of the subscribers in the comments are so eager to praise Ars for "catching" the error and being honest by retracting the article, as if that's not an expected journalistic standard. They're so happy to have a re
117.
by vor_ 8mo ago
Another red flag is that the article used repetitive phrases in an AI-like way: "...it illustrates exactly the kind of unsupervised output that makes open source maintainers wary." followed later on by "[It] illustrates exact
118.
by vor_ 8mo ago
The comment calling him a bot is sarcasm.
119.
by vor_ 8mo ago
I don't know. The novelty of LLMs faded very quickly for me.
120.
by vor_ 8mo ago
Is this list AI-generated?

More ›