vole

6 ms·

1.
by vole 8y ago
it's available to scihub
2.
by vole 8y ago
A similar thing occured with LSD. It was only manufactured by Sandoz until the patents expired and the quantities manufactured exploded.
3.
by vole 8y ago
vorite quote "You can often view glimpses of ingeniousness... not as inexplicable miracles, but as the residue of experience." Did he pen that one or borrow it from someone else? Although I can't say it hasn't been said
4.
by vole 8y ago
The same thing is a huge problem in OpenStreetMaps for me .
5.
by vole 8y ago
I disagree with this. Often what is gained from a proof is not the fact that a proof is known, but more insights about the original problem. So, a small technical error may "invalidate" a proof but it does not make it meaningless.
6.
by vole 8y ago
>Most of the other non-polynomial functions have an equivalent Taylor polynomial _analytic_ functions have a Taylor _series_, but it would be incorrect to say that "most" functions have a taylor series, and a taylor series is n
7.
by vole 8y ago
Matrix attempts to be a solution to this
8.
by vole 8y ago
would recommend William Basinski - The Distintegration loops in this regard
9.
by vole 8y ago
test comment
10.
by vole 8y ago
For further reading, LSD: My problem child by Albert Hofmann is also interesting
11.
by vole 9y ago
Isn't that their entire argument?
12.
by vole 9y ago
>Yet there's still one small simplification that can be made: the condition in the inner loop doesn't need "!= '\0'". I believe this would cause the newline not to be printed in the unknown command error, so