Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
vog
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
28 ms
·
181.
▲
by
vog
9y ago
Site is down. Google Cache: https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:nHJYRo... <obligatory-rant> I'll never understand why serving static(!) sites is so hard. Are modern blog systems still that bad?
182.
▲
by
vog
9y ago
I agree that these types of tests are very good and usefuly, but: Don't they use the wrong term for them? I believe these tests are more commonly called "integration tests", not "unit tests". Or, did I misunderstand
183.
▲
by
vog
9y ago
> You don't ever install anything, it just exists when you ask for it Relevant XKCD: "Installing" https://xkcd.com/1367/
184.
▲
by
vog
9y ago
A deep analysis on social bots, fake news, hate speech and filter bubbles on Twitter. This is questions the existence, as well as quality of studies about, the co-called "social bots" (which turned out to either have no influence,
185.
▲
by
vog
9y ago
Very good problem description and nice list of countermeasures! However, the following countermeasure made be wonder: > Manually retype excerpts to avoid invisible characters and homoglyphs. Isn't this something you can automate?
186.
▲
by
vog
9y ago
> Seriously, why all the sourpuss comments? ... a fun little way to potentially use these registers in an innovative fashion and you jump all over ... Not sure which "sourpuss comments" you mean. Perhaps a direct reply to one
187.
▲
by
vog
9y ago
From the article: *> The Taligent frameworks look [...] like fairly standard 1990s OOP-in-C++ which almost certainly makes them less fun to use than modern Qt. What exactly does the author mean with that? In how far does Qt deviate (for
188.
▲
by
vog
9y ago
This is a very interesting development! But doesn't that mean we are merely reimplementing old concepts on a new level? Almost everything we do on VM level we already did on process level: - Read-only VM images are essentially like st
189.
▲
by
vog
9y ago
Do you care to elaborate? Your proposal doesn't make any sense to me. What message? What kind of signature? How does it help to claim some altcoins with a net positive outcome?
190.
▲
by
vog
9y ago
Is this interesting (or at least relevant) for the freifunk project?
191.
▲
by
vog
9y ago
Use proper URIs? (Or in this case: an ISBN, which serves the same purpose. Unambiguous references are no longer an open issue. Open issue are: the lazyness to not use them, and persistent references (until either Bittorrent or IPFS is fully
192.
▲
by
vog
9y ago
Given the current Bitcoin exchange rates and transaction fees, this "single transaction" could still be more expensive than the value you get out from all altcoins combined. It depends on how much Bitcoin you have, though.
193.
▲
by
vog
9y ago
Be careful not to make your "claim" on an altcoin that has a very low value compared to Bitcoin. Why? Well, to be safe, you need at least on Bitcoin transaction [1]. But that means you'll receive a loss if those transaction f
194.
▲
by
vog
9y ago
Moreover, you have stuff like password managers going though the clipboard. Relying on all tools correctly identifying their sensitive datasets and protecting them though mlock() is doomed to fail. If anything, a proper security concept sho
195.
▲
by
vog
9y ago
Sorry in advance for this perhaps stupid question, but: Which Sapiens exactly do you mean? Is it an article, a book, a documentary movie, a presentation such as a TED talk? Which is the full title? I suppose you mean the book "Sapien
196.
▲
by
vog
9y ago
I wonder how this compares to other unix systems, such as OpenBSD or various Linux Distros.
197.
▲
by
vog
9y ago
> what you need is a desire to learn everyday This is true, but in my opinion this advice misses the point. Of course, if you are older and finally developed this skill, you don't need anything more. However, the questioner seems
198.
▲
by
vog
9y ago
If you want to get a really deep understanding, study computer science (e.g. bachelor/master) [1], then specialize by taking all security courses that are offered. Not only will you get a deep understanding of the topic, you will build
199.
▲
by
vog
9y ago
Thanks for pointing this out. BTW, I really wish that short explainations were mandatory for downvotes. This would have cleared this up early on.
200.
▲
by
vog
9y ago
Wow, being downvoted for correcting a misquote. That's HN at its best.
201.
▲
by
vog
9y ago
I like that story, too, but note that the actual quote was: "I have discovered a truly marvelous proof of this, which this margin is too narrow to contain." https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/
202.
▲
by
vog
9y ago
> And I still can't multiply six times eight! I have to work it out every time... No offense intended, but if that still bothers you, it's time to learn it. Either by accepting the offer you got with 5 (that is, memorizing th
203.
▲
by
vog
9y ago
That's strange. Didn't find it, now it's there. Did they just add it? I'm using the TLS version, though: https://chalkdustmagazine.com/feed/
204.
▲
by
vog
9y ago
Very nice site! Too bad they don't offer an RSS feed, so it's hard for me to keep in touch with that site.
205.
▲
by
vog
9y ago
> It's the embedded folks, who tell that it is not made for this. Really? If so, this is just a small minority of the embedded folks. Think of the whole "Internet of Things" security mess, combined with a large part of &
206.
▲
by
vog
9y ago
This strongly reminds me of the various math magazines we have here in Germany. (I know that other countries have similar magazines, but I only grew up with the German ones, except for one Canadian one.) The most popular seems to be "W
207.
▲
by
vog
9y ago
> Their TOC needs to be collapsible Not sure what you mean. In the lower left there is a working collapse button.
208.
▲
by
vog
9y ago
Thanks for the pointer, although that's not what I'm looking for. The fundamental difference between reactive state management (Mobx) and the Redux approach is that Mobx has some automatisms that are vital to what I'm looking
209.
▲
by
vog
9y ago
Thanks for the update! But is that actually an improvement over the previous situation? (Serious question.)
210.
▲
by
vog
9y ago
I tend to disagree with both points. > The W3C is for web authors. It presents a more stable recommendation and provides advice (based on research) for authors. Web authors usually use MDN instead, because it serves that purpose in a m
More ›