From the article: *> The Taligent frameworks look [...] like fairly standard 1990s OOP-in-C++ which almost certainly makes them less fun to use than modern Qt.

From the article: *> The Taligent frameworks look [...] like fairly standard 1990s OOP-in-C++ which almost certainly makes them less fun to use than modern Qt. What exactly does the author mean with that? In how far does Qt deviate (for the better) from classic OOP?