vntok

43 ms·

811.
by vntok 7y ago
Try a Google search with date range, plenty of original results here: https://www.google.com/search?q=microsoft+netscape+browser+w...
812.
by vntok 7y ago
Probably, just like any other technology.. what is your point?
813.
by vntok 7y ago
The spec says SHOULD though, not MUST. Chrome is compliant.
814.
by vntok 7y ago
Please go read the spec, you will find that Chrome is perfectly compliant with it regarding the autocomplete attribute handling.
815.
by vntok 7y ago
Have a look at this graph [1], Firefox is definitely not a "common" browser today in most countries; Chrome, Safari and their many siblings are. Unless your company's website is only targeting a country where Firefox someho
816.
by vntok 7y ago
Your statement is orthogonal to the original point, which is whether we should trust him with his denial or not.
817.
by vntok 7y ago
Seems like a net win.
818.
by vntok 7y ago
Proof that money can't buy everything.
819.
by vntok 7y ago
If you don't immediately see the incoming traffic in question, yes you will. Otherwise your self preservation rules will prevail and you won't budge. Note that self driving vehicles aren't different from humans in that respec
820.
by vntok 7y ago
Yes?
821.
by vntok 7y ago
Why not? Seems like he coded his personal website himself without an existing template.
822.
by vntok 7y ago
Well it's true. The Hacker News audience is so specific it is not similar to any specific country's population, let alone world population (ie "people" in the general sense). That's certainly not to say the HN audie
823.
by vntok 7y ago
Rainbow tables don't work here because the password is salted.
824.
by vntok 7y ago
No thank you. The TC article is both entertaining and factual.
825.
by vntok 7y ago
Well your example issue would precisely be solved by only displaying the domain name to users. Paypal.com vs random-Name.com: much easier to distinguish.
826.
by vntok 7y ago
I'm confused, where did you get the impression that he only wants to read the cooking section and nothing from the regular newspaper? Or do you want him to pay $200 for the general contents + $40 a year for recipes? Is it the same kind
827.
by vntok 7y ago
You took a bite off it though, so your measurement is in fact biased. Other people might measure 0.75 apple instead.
828.
by vntok 7y ago
You're not the user story that they optimize for. Try leaving the Gmail tab open for a while, you'll quickly get to reap the speed benefits too.
829.
by vntok 7y ago
Non-personalized ads.
830.
by vntok 7y ago
Or, you know, they could innovate by themselves instead of relying on Google to do all the heavy lifting?
831.
by vntok 7y ago
This is very disingenuous. How about: 1999 - we do 1 service 2019 - we do 100s of services
832.
by vntok 7y ago
This might be sensible for a wordpress plugin ecommerce website, however it is a ridiculous position when talking about Google activities. Gmail's point and value proposition is to store and fetch personal and professional information
833.
by vntok 7y ago
It's invalid to imply that they are the only one with bad practices. That angle is designed to turn the general population against a single entity, without context, akin to a witch hunt.
834.
by vntok 7y ago
What fruit starts with A and is found in red yellow or green? Please answer in 5 letters
835.
by vntok 7y ago
The next one in the sequence, anytime you need a new number?
836.
by vntok 7y ago
Twitter can take them down as they wish. It is upon the office of the president to archive his tweets.
837.
by vntok 7y ago
Make it an easy-to-click report button and pretty much every site whose politics I disagree with will get a downvote... every article by a person I disagree with as well. The question is: how useful is that to the search engine, or indeed t
838.
by vntok 7y ago
What you are describing is a literal filter bubble, where very soon your only exposure to content will be seeing content you are already liking, ideas you are already adhering to, people you are already looking to. A bubble where ideas and
839.
by vntok 7y ago
Chrome has had NoScript equivalents for a while, you should try it again!
840.
by vntok 7y ago
It's not a question of pulling strings, it's a question of being able and willing to maintain a complex piece of software and hardware after you get the terminaison.

More ›