vladimir929

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by vladimir929 2y ago

   Fantastic project
2. 2.▲
   by vladimir929 4y ago

   I follow archeology closely. I find the common reference to “common sense” interpretations to be pretty off base. There probably were queer Vikings, borders probably were diffuse, conquest was complicated and probably didn’t affect the live
3. 3.▲
   by vladimir929 4y ago

   They did have the Mayan language to work with though. The Minoan language has been likely dead for 2000 years. That was also the breakthrough with the Rosetta Stone too. That Coptic was a modern version of ancient Egyptian.
4. 4.▲
   by vladimir929 4y ago

   I don’t think so. When you look at the historical record. Work either in the modern or agricultural sense has only existed for at most 5% of human existence. It’s a modern concept.
5. 5.▲
   by vladimir929 4y ago

   Sure but rock art is extremely extremely hard to interpret. The foremost world experts in it. Do not make such claims. Unless there was a mushroom literally found at the site how can a serious person make such a bold claim. (Even if a mushr
6. 6.▲
   by vladimir929 4y ago

   TL;DR you cannot attribute this rock art to mushrooms. Rock art specialists will say that interpreting rock art is extremely hard and should be done with caution. When even the foremost experts have been completely wrong when taking their i