vladimir-y

5 ms·

1.
by vladimir-y 1y ago
> They are all crying for the audience, the losers. There is an opinion that making them (a big business, and overseas players too), crying for audience is a way to make them loyal to a regime. So they come to the audience, they kiss the
2.
by vladimir-y 7y ago
https://github.com/DeaDBeeF-Player/deadbeef
3.
by vladimir-y 7y ago
Is there a way I could let some CI service like Travis CI to ONLY publish the packages to this GitHub Package Registry? ONLY means I don't want to expose the entire GitHub account to Travis CI but allow only publishing to the registry.
4.
by vladimir-y 7y ago
> focusing on a compiler versus a full on framework Angular goes a similar way, just look up Ivy renderer on the internet.
5.
by vladimir-y 7y ago
Zones is only responsible for triggering change detection caused by user/external input. It's possible to use Angular without Zones.
6.
by vladimir-y 7y ago
> Cybernetically enhanced web apps Is not AOT compilation is a more traditional name for such stuff?
7.
by vladimir-y 7y ago
- Is speed comparison going to include Angular with Ivy renderer enabled (and probably OnPush change detection strategy enabled)? It's also AOT rendering stuff that doesn't use virtual DOM. - There is a lot of static code analyzin
8.
by vladimir-y 8y ago
"... than Apple says" as thinking and saying is not the same thing.
9.
by vladimir-y 8y ago
Apple dumped audio-jack in order to make more money selling pricey AirPods. Now they want even more of your money.
10.
by vladimir-y 8y ago
> Brexit is completely dumb Well not completely. It allows UK politicians to imitate useful activity around the Brexit.
11.
by vladimir-y 8y ago
If you need to maintain and extend the project I'd consider converting the JavaScript code to TypeScript with strict compilation option enabled.
12.
by vladimir-y 8y ago
> TypeScript revolutionized the act of writing JavaScript I agree with this point. > React and JSX revolutionized the act of writing HTML I see nothing revolutionary in React. > GraphQL revolutionized the act of connecting front e
13.
by vladimir-y 8y ago
I was a Firefox user long time ago, but then switched to Chrome since Firefox was freezing as hell. But just recently I switched back to Firefox Quantum and have been happy so far. No freezing anymore, open source, all the needed features.
14.
by vladimir-y 8y ago
Try this ['1','1','1'].map(Number). That's just about language specifics, not a question for seniors in my opinion.
15.
by vladimir-y 8y ago
It's built on Electron.js, so for Desktop only, how is it useful then? https://www.inoreader.com/ is still working well by the way.
16.
by vladimir-y 8y ago
Lenovo Thinkpad line, Dell Latitude line, HP Zbook line.
17.
by vladimir-y 9y ago
You are doing it wrong asking the question instead of starting doing stuff either with your mentor or in your own. It's never too late while you are alive.
18.
by vladimir-y 9y ago
> It's the most simple framework I've ever learned. Not a framework, but library.
19.
by vladimir-y 9y ago
Sure, but just don't limit yourself by the Rollup.js only. Again Webpack is a module bundler (modularization is there), and it was a module bundler before Rollup.js went public. So you can use all the ES6/7/TypeScript stuff (
20.
by vladimir-y 9y ago
It's already a common approach to pack CSS and some other stuff into the single JS bundle, so it's feasibly and many devs already do that. It should be possible to do with any modern bundler, including Webpack of course.
21.
by vladimir-y 9y ago
Why would you use Parcel if it's not yet ready to provide all the needed functionality? There is also fuse-box bundler, I din't try it on complex projects though (and not going to in the near future), but in some terms it might be
22.
by vladimir-y 9y ago
Webpack actually does the same (it's module bundler), browserify too (but in a more limited way). Gulp ant Grunt are not the module bundlers at all, but simply a task runners - absolutely different things. Btw there is also FuseBox mod
23.
by vladimir-y 9y ago
There are many Linux distros these days with graphical installers, that look great out of the box, etc.
24.
by vladimir-y 9y ago
Apple pushes those who have not yet moved to Linux to do so?
25.
by vladimir-y 9y ago
> In a weakly typed language like Javascript, I don't think you'll ever regret being a little more explicit. "!!" is not needed in the shown case. It might be needed if you want to pass somewhere or return "boole
26.
by vladimir-y 9y ago
it's more than just a type checker
27.
by vladimir-y 9y ago
You might want to try Typescript.
28.
by vladimir-y 9y ago
> with extra Vue extended syntax Syntax remains the same as it's still just HTML with a custom attributes.
29.
by vladimir-y 9y ago
You are comparing with Handlebars templates, which bring an overhead on top of the HTML structure itself - in this case it makes sense to use JS instead of the custom syntax. But compare with Thymeleaf/Angular/Vue like templates -
30.
by vladimir-y 9y ago
> It never gets turned into HTML Really? So users get the JS code in the browser rendered in the same way as the code source looks, not the dynamically built DOM model which has the native representation form of HTML? Surely JSX is an ab

More ›