vkadfa4

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by vkadfa4 4y ago

   Fair questions in any age, save the technology related ones. Most have asked the same questions over and over. Some answers have lead humanity further than where it was before. So good for you to keep moving the wheel of change. Spoiler ale
2. 2.▲
   by vkadfa4 4y ago

   You guys are so much really sure all life needs to take off from chemical reactions. I wouldn't be so sure. Not even for our Sun system, nor even our own planet. Humans really, historically have had little imagination, think electricit
3. 3.▲
   by vkadfa4 4y ago

   Thanks for writing this, I'm reading it now. my comment before knowing the information you provide in the text is simple, these models are trained over some texts downloaded from Internet, there are some real "trends" you can
4. 4.▲
   by vkadfa4 4y ago

   No, not really. Yes, for some as it's been mentioned. Not really because there are true tools with very real productive capabilities which are just being lightly showed in the "trendy" generative apps you've heard of. On
5. 5.▲
   by vkadfa4 4y ago

   "First, the gap between "Early commercial applications" and "Approaching transformative AI" seems very very very very very large to me." It's a common opinion, it could be wrong by now, you see chatGPT is
6. 6.▲
   by vkadfa4 4y ago

   you guys are not getting it right, ChatGPT has just explained us how much IQ has itself. it looks it works better with situations than plans..like having the chance to signal a message about explicit capabilities, surpasing the obvious filt