Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
vitus
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
26 ms
·
181.
▲
by
vitus
2y ago
> P.s. how much is an exaflop or petaflop, and how significant is it? The numbers thrown around in this article don't mean anything to me. Is this new cluster way more powerful than the last top? Nominally, a measurement in "fl
182.
▲
by
vitus
2y ago
> It's quite possible for one broadcasters 480p30 to be a higher bitrate than another broadcasters 720p60 Yes, I don't think anyone's disputing that. > I remember watching the last season of Game of Thrones on one strea
183.
▲
by
vitus
2y ago
I mean, yes, but nobody streams RAW video in practice, and I can't imagine any users or service providers who'd be happy with that level of inefficiency. In general, it's safe to assume some reasonable compression (which, yes
184.
▲
by
vitus
2y ago
> Why it is hard for Netflix. They have already figured out CDN part. So it should not be a problem even if it is 1M or 100M. because their CDN infrastructure is already handling the load ... Note: I am not saying my 100k is same scaling
185.
▲
by
vitus
2y ago
FIFA claimed the 2022 World Cup final reached 1.5 billion people worldwide, but again that seems like it was mostly via broadcast television and cable. As far as single stream, Disney's Hotstar claimed 59 million for last year's C
186.
▲
by
vitus
2y ago
It's fundamentally different, for sure. Most third-party internet-based streaming solutions are overlaid on top of a point-to-point network, while broadcast is one-to-many, and even cable tends to use multicast within the cable provide
187.
▲
by
vitus
2y ago
> I would guess YouTube, being built on google's infrastructure , has powerful enough edge nodes that they stream one video stream to each edge location and the edges transcode for the clients. Ha, no, our edge nodes don't have
188.
▲
by
vitus
2y ago
> Today Google is $2.5T marketcap and you can bet a significant portion of it came from the work culture created in the office. Ah yes, that must be why execs at Google are incentivizing hiring in lower cost-of-labor locations like India
189.
▲
by
vitus
2y ago
Okay. I've fully reconstituted the image, to the best of my ability: https://i.imgur.com/8XemFj2.png from PIL import Image png = Image.open('screenshot.png') pxl = Image.frombytes('
190.
▲
by
vitus
2y ago
If anyone's curious, https://i.imgur.com/08vtB4n.png was my initial attempt to recover the garbled screenshot at the end of the post, although I did end up throwing away the vast majority of the pixels. It's at le
191.
▲
by
vitus
2y ago
One other thing to have in your back pocket: In certain jurisdictions, it's actually against the law for employers to ask you for your current salary during the interview process (pre-offer), as that can perpetuate wage discrimination.
192.
▲
by
vitus
2y ago
Don't forget you also have to divide by two (so, 1 in 24 billion) if you only want to consider the upper end of the range, since that number is essentially "fraction of the population that doesn't fall within mean +/- 6.
193.
▲
by
vitus
2y ago
No disagreement here; the link I provided was specifically for TSMC Washington. I'm not saying that TSMC is never going to build anything in the US, but rather that the current Lunar / Arrow Lake chips on the market are not being
194.
▲
by
vitus
2y ago
TSMC doesn't have any cutting-edge fabs in the US yet. TSMC Washington is making 160nm silicon [0], and TSMC Arizona is still under construction. [0] https://www.tsmcwashington.com/en/foundry/technology.html
195.
▲
by
vitus
2y ago
This particular article seems to be referring to brominated flame retardants (BFRs) -- there's a single reference to "PBDEs" in the text, and the original cited research paper [0] talks about various BFRs. The purported issue
196.
▲
by
vitus
2y ago
As I mentioned -- it's not actually slow in absolute terms! The experience is lodged in my mind because it took so much more time than the reverse trip, and it was sweltering to be stuck on a train with inadequate air conditioning on a
197.
▲
by
vitus
2y ago
That's understating the actual number of distinct components you need to know, but even so, just memorizing the individual ideograms still isn't enough to allow you to read Chinese with meaningful fluency. Since the sound ch
198.
▲
by
vitus
2y ago
I'd accept that interpretation. To be more precise, I view it as a demonstration of information loss from replacing classical characters entirely with romanization, as opposed to a forceful argument against any form of adoption of roma
199.
▲
by
vitus
2y ago
Um, no. If you're talking about radicals (of which there are generally considered to be 214), yes, but you can't read / write in general if you only know those. Also, of those 214, a good chunk aren't standalone words. Y
200.
▲
by
vitus
2y ago
This discussion wouldn't be complete without a mention of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lion-Eating_Poet_in_the_Stone_... , which AIUI was initially constructed as an argument against Romanization. In short, it
201.
▲
by
vitus
2y ago
They do exist, but as far as I'm aware, wubi and cangjie are very uncommon relative to zhuyin and pinyin. Even so, my experience is that you end up just memorizing chords for typing particular characters, as opposed to regularly derivi
202.
▲
by
vitus
2y ago
To emphasize just how fast this is in comparison to regular rail: When I was visiting France some years back and took the TER train on the way from Paris to Strasbourg (300mi / 500km), and that crawled . On the way back, we took the T
203.
▲
by
vitus
2y ago
One of those does point to the underlying organization, "Righters Group" which seems to be a rightwing fundraising group. Specifically, if you perform a `whois` on email-comply.com, you can find Registrant Organization: Forc
204.
▲
by
vitus
2y ago
Good news! Both HTTP/2 and HTTP/3 use a packed binary representation for headers, so CRLF is nowhere to be found in RFC 9113 / 9114. I don't see value in picking on Google or HTTP here, even if it is fashionable to do so
205.
▲
by
vitus
2y ago
Sure. HTTP/1.1 isn't the only network protocol, though, IETF standardization or otherwise. For SMTP (which this subthread started with): In addition, the appearance of "bare" "CR" or "LF" charact
206.
▲
by
vitus
2y ago
Yeah. Zendesk only put a bandaid in place to prevent this particular attack vector for the Slack infiltration attack, and did nothing for the initially reported issue.
207.
▲
by
vitus
2y ago
Hey, now you have to bypass two spam filters, and also email verification from Apple is now marked as likely-spam. Which addresses the very specific Slack infiltration attack, but doesn't address the underlying issue.
208.
▲
by
vitus
2y ago
I thought this was first attributed to Fred Brooks in the 70s. > Brooks points out this limited divisibility with another example: while it takes one woman nine months to make one baby, "nine women can't make a baby in one mont
209.
▲
by
vitus
2y ago
Why is the submission a link to a twitter screenshot of a news article? https://www.mercurynews.com/2024/10/07/h-1b-visa-company-sup... is the paywalled source. That said, https://www.siliconvalley
210.
▲
by
vitus
2y ago
> 1. Apple is not next, which is the main point Sure, I agree with that point. I disagree with the rest of your framing why, which was a dismissal that "Apple won on the same claims in front of a different judge". The judge in
More ›