visualblind

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by visualblind 2y ago

   Looks like the site is down. Appears to be a VPS on Ghandi's platform.
2. 2.▲
   by visualblind 2y ago

   > Using an expensive GPU block (with most of its cores idling) to encode slightly faster than a cheaper CPU core will do? Slightly faster? Sir, I do think you are mistaken. There are other variables go that into it such as choosing betwe
3. 3.▲
   by visualblind 2y ago

   The major companies are such as nvidia Cuda (nvenc encoder/nvdec decoder) and VAAPI in Intel CPUs. FFmpeg has lot of good documentation on this subject.
4. 4.▲
   by visualblind 2y ago

   I agree with your statement mostly. However I think if we're dealing with 1080p displays, hardware-accelerated transcoding produces acceptable video quality for non-4k+ watching. That's just my 2 cents.
5. 5.▲
   by visualblind 2y ago

   Video codec transcoding is very CPU resource expensive. If you do a lot of it, you should be looking into doing hardware-accelerated transcoding. https://trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/HWAccelIntro My ffmpeg how-to/examples