Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
viraptor
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
43 ms
·
871.
▲
by
viraptor
1y ago
> It was a clear violation Can you show us the proof? > Most of the people had come on the wrong visa Can you show us the proof? > knowingly Can you show us the proof? You're very sure about it without all the details being kn
872.
▲
by
viraptor
1y ago
There are more options than "tourist" and "working" visa. Your message is significantly oversimplifying it. Until we know what they were actually doing at work (really, not claimed by ice), we won't know how valid t
873.
▲
by
viraptor
1y ago
> since we're already tip-fatigued Bluetti hit the "are you actually fucking serious?" level for me with the tips. They ask you for a % tip when you order online from them. No employee contact, no consultation. I just adde
874.
▲
by
viraptor
1y ago
You can still use the bank website on the phone.
875.
▲
by
viraptor
1y ago
As you say, it's an "if". There was no testimony so far. For now we don't know what they did there. I'm just pointing out that no, the photos really do not say much about their work.
876.
▲
by
viraptor
1y ago
People who were having a meeting at my home construction site: architect, builders' reception staff, inspectors, interior person, electrician's staff, garden designer, etc. and that's just for a simple house. There's goi
877.
▲
by
viraptor
1y ago
> This one is where ICE’s operation is completely fair. The "completely" is going quite far given the treatment of them. They could be sent a notice ordering to stop work and leave. Or the employer could be told to start applyi
878.
▲
by
viraptor
1y ago
You can't typically enter a construction site without a hardhat and hi-vis. Even as a visitor. And even if you can, you may not want to for your own safety. What they were wearing says absolutely nothing about their work.
879.
▲
by
viraptor
1y ago
> where we don't follow certain laws because we disagree with them, or do we follow all laws and try to change the ones we disagree with? Neither. The laws are enforced based on how which group is affected. For example Elon also sta
880.
▲
by
viraptor
1y ago
Already posted above: https://github.com/twitter/the-algorithm/blob/c54bec0d4e029f... It's redacted.
881.
▲
by
viraptor
1y ago
That's what the Australian Tax Office does. Just a plaintext message that's effectively "you've got a new message. Go to the website to read it."
882.
▲
by
viraptor
1y ago
You did effectively say nobody wants their API though. And that's not true.
883.
▲
by
viraptor
1y ago
It's interesting, but have you considered doing something positive or at least neutral for the society instead?
884.
▲
by
viraptor
1y ago
It's relative to the boss for me. If the runback is 2x the time of an early fight, it sucks. I know it incentivises learning, but some bosses really do wipe you in a couple of hits at the beginning - a number of times.
885.
▲
by
viraptor
1y ago
Are there actually long runbacks in Silksong? I'm not that far in, but so far they've all been maybe 2 screens long at most which you can cross really quickly.
886.
▲
by
viraptor
1y ago
That's a weird summary given how many people around me use Claude with Cursor and still prefer it over gpt5. I don't think you can claim a complete view of what their customers want.
887.
▲
by
viraptor
1y ago
https://xcancel.com/claudeai/status/1965208247302029728
888.
▲
How inaccurate are Nintendo's official emulators? [video]
(youtube.com)
125 points
by
viraptor
1y ago
|
58 comments
889.
▲
by
viraptor
1y ago
Once you're in a contract + TAM territory, pricing works very differently. Also, temporary experiments and usage overruns become an interesting experience where the company may just forget to bill you a few thousands $ just because nob
890.
▲
by
viraptor
1y ago
It's only been a few hours. I doubt anyone knows.
891.
▲
by
viraptor
1y ago
Why fight people? If you already have the data on overestimation, why not produce numbers adjusted based on the previous experience? Estimation in engineering is famously hard to solve. Maybe the best answer is - don't.
892.
▲
by
viraptor
1y ago
> Any reason for this? They're not trained for that. And there's no good reason to improve it if you can instead rerun the paragraph saying "make this slightly shorter". > If a basic online word count tool can do t
893.
▲
by
viraptor
1y ago
This doesn't really average. There's less lead, but more micro plastics for example. There less cadmium, but more pesticides. Etc.
894.
▲
by
viraptor
1y ago
> Why are doctors telling women that it's okay to take Tylenol during pregnancy in the first place? Because there's no clear evidence to the contrary. Research and published papers would be more convincing here than an accusati
895.
▲
by
viraptor
1y ago
Water. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_intoxication Meat. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protein_toxicity
896.
▲
by
viraptor
1y ago
I disagree with the "not only". The idea in xp is to write the test first. http://www.extremeprogramming.org/rules/testfirst.html You don't know how many methods/functions (if any) you're going
897.
▲
by
viraptor
1y ago
You mean AWS doesn't pay for on-call at all? I'm sure it happens at least in some regions where it's mendatory by regulation.
898.
▲
by
viraptor
1y ago
You're agreeing with me there. "each one exercising a little piece of functionality". In Beck's approach the tests are added at each step for a simple functionality addition, which then gets implemented in the project to
899.
▲
by
viraptor
1y ago
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fantastic_Beasts_and_Where_t...
900.
▲
by
viraptor
1y ago
That's only if you don't preserve the results explicitly. If you're trying to delve into some new code without enough docs, I could imagine learning lots about the system along the LLM and then leaving that as documentation a
More ›