vinkupa

24 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by vinkupa 10mo ago

   Smart approach but, is the trade off worth it? Most code reviewers provide enough information in PR comments - see coderabbit, turingmind AI, greptile etc this adds slim value on top of that must have tooling layer
2. 2.▲
   Show HN: Claude Code Review Skill with Memory - Saves me $$$ on Opus 4.5 tokens

   1 points by vinkupa 10mo ago|0 comments
3. 3.▲
   Show HN: Hate NiTpIcKS? Claude Code skill to the rescue(github.com)

   2 points by vinkupa 10mo ago|0 comments
4. 4.▲
   Show HN: Claude Code Skill for Deep Code Reviews(github.com)

   2 points by vinkupa 10mo ago|0 comments
5. 5.▲
   by vinkupa 10mo ago

   for anyone doing serious code reviews, this lines up with how TuringMind AI has evolved: RAG is nice for “what looks like this code?”, but impact-aware review is almost never a pure similarity problem. What actually matters in review are th
6. 6.▲
   Show HN: Finally, PR Reviews That Don't Suck(turingmind.ai)

   2 points by vinkupa 10mo ago|0 comments
7. 7.▲
   We Deleted Our Vector Database(turingmind.ai)

   3 points by vinkupa 10mo ago|3 comments