Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
vikramkr
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
19 ms
·
301.
▲
by
vikramkr
3y ago
That's what cd19 car t was already developed and FDA approved for
302.
▲
by
vikramkr
3y ago
The quantum considerations have more to do with the molecular level. There are definitely quantum effects and considerations for what's happening at the level of enzymes and chemical reactions and they might matter with neurotransmitte
303.
▲
by
vikramkr
3y ago
Very inefficiently. That's not being glib you can simulate them just fine it just takes forever
304.
▲
by
vikramkr
3y ago
Are these chips actually what was being envisioned when folks were talking about sub 10nm back then in terms of the real feature sizes and performance?
305.
▲
by
vikramkr
3y ago
A physics textbook? For intro to physics? Instead of Khan academy? I wouldn't be surprised is a double digit percentage of students never even open their 30 year old decaying textbook in their high school physics class.
306.
▲
by
vikramkr
3y ago
I'm curious how many students would agree that textbooks are useful at all. My memories of college include actively finding ways to avoid having to buy textbooks and never opening a textbook if lectures were recorded. The best classes
307.
▲
by
vikramkr
3y ago
Now I'm curious - is this blog post licensed? It's essentially an adaptation of Andrej's talk and even if substack wasn't monetized this blog is definitely an adaptation/substitute of the original talk as the post i
308.
▲
by
vikramkr
3y ago
I don't actually know if it's clickbait. A huge portion of the video is actually just laying the groundwork for the importance of feedback and being afraid to speak up because of political and management concerns is actually a cen
309.
▲
by
vikramkr
3y ago
No they did actually follow through on the charging stuff to the point where NACS is now the new north American standard, which is kind of wild to see given how they've acted before.
310.
▲
by
vikramkr
3y ago
No they didn't become a private equity firm, a private equity firm's roll-up firm bought the old broadcom and took the acquisition target's name. They didn't change the ticker though it's why they're still AVGO
311.
▲
by
vikramkr
3y ago
It's a system to measure endosymbiosis in an organism that's already undergone endosymbiosis so not directly applicable for the entirety of gp's hypothesis, but there's definitely a ton of research into it. There'll
312.
▲
by
vikramkr
3y ago
The nucleus is also considered a potential candidate for endosymbiosis [1] and I'd really love to see some actual evidence for your claims at some point instead of just vague handwaving (1) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
313.
▲
by
vikramkr
3y ago
After wave after wave of theranos/crypto/NFTs/ftx etc etc honestly I've got very little patience left and they've soured the entire national mood on silicon valley to the point where this crowd was the justification
314.
▲
by
vikramkr
3y ago
The gp said there's no way a board can stop employees from leaving and the one I was replying to started with "that depends" and suggested it was a question as to whether the board "believed" employees held all the
315.
▲
by
vikramkr
3y ago
I'm unfamiliar with research into the difficulty of the second endosymbiotic event that no humans were present to measure and analyze being reduced by the existence of a first endosymbiotic event that has also not been replicated in a
316.
▲
by
vikramkr
3y ago
No, to the specific question of making employees stay, that's not a thing that you can do outside of prisons. If employees want to leave they can leave. If they want to start the nonprofit from scratch, they can do that but employees c
317.
▲
by
vikramkr
3y ago
Ah yes, all those "customers" that build products that were a thin wrapper of chatgpt with an extra feature, truly the innovative powerhouses that will revive our economy /s. I mean seriously, if anyone thought they were goin
318.
▲
by
vikramkr
3y ago
Yes - see your previous message for reference. Qualifications were not mentioned as the likely reason for his selection to the board
319.
▲
by
vikramkr
3y ago
They might mean net? Have the same number of customers at the end as the start? Instead of a steep cliff?
320.
▲
by
vikramkr
3y ago
Did they really create a ton more jobs? The past few rounds of industrialization and automation have coinved with plagues/the black death that massively reduced the population, mass agitation, increasing inequality, and recently a majo
321.
▲
by
vikramkr
3y ago
I mean, it happened again with chloroplasts and there's a bunch of other cases of endosymbiosis too it's not that rare
322.
▲
by
vikramkr
3y ago
Yeah, who is he to think that people will bother writing a book when the film rights are already probably being fought over by every studio. This is very obviously gonna be a movie or two lol
323.
▲
by
vikramkr
3y ago
All they had to do was say why they fired him. A toddler could whip up the same amount of backlash against a board that bungled their communications so badly. The reason everyone settled on that take was that the take was pur forward that i
324.
▲
by
vikramkr
3y ago
But then that doesn't square with board refuses to tell employees or Microsoft or the public that altman committed malfeasance or provide examples. That would be pretty cut and dry and msft wouldn't be willing to acquihire the ent
325.
▲
by
vikramkr
3y ago
Those mechanisms only exist because class is malleable. You don't need to worry about old or new money of etiquette or mannerisms or anything with caste because it's immutable, period. You can't get out it even by changing yo
326.
▲
by
vikramkr
3y ago
Yeah there's no way for them to make that argument look good, especially to a democratic voting base. That's because that argument is bad and they should feel bad for making it. Also by the plain text of that argument, "all h
327.
▲
by
vikramkr
3y ago
No it's not. You can change your class you can't change your caste - your caste is literally determined exclusively by birth. It's a form of race and has nothing to do with social standing.
328.
▲
by
vikramkr
3y ago
Agreed. Honestly I think these bills are purely symbolic since casteism is racism is discrimination against a protected class. So if they don't matter and are purely symbolic, what's wrong with passing the bill? The only argument
329.
▲
by
vikramkr
3y ago
There better not be any comments on this thread about this paper from 2019 that didn't really make a huge splash and is entirely in cell culture that go "oh boy another cancer cure too bad they make it to the clinic." This is
330.
▲
by
vikramkr
3y ago
Also yes, duh, my point is that the prior bias in question is the common one that's being reinforced by the title
More ›