vibrato2

10 ms·

31.
by vibrato2 5y ago
Citation needed for “more side effects” this is a Nobel prize winning drug which has a markedly safe profile. Not like the vaccines which fda admits have no long term data available.
32.
by vibrato2 5y ago
On the other hand, this meta study found 20 mechanisms of action by ivermectin against covid and general efficacy as treatment. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8203399/
33.
by vibrato2 5y ago
Since that’s impossible for you to back up, I question why you would say it. Rationally speaking
34.
by vibrato2 5y ago
We have no encouraging long term data from any mRNA therapy. this is brand new. The animal tests were concerning to put it mildly. Your chances of serious illness are lower for now. ADE shows dose dependent acceleration, so by the 4th or 5t
35.
by vibrato2 5y ago
I’m very confident I’ve been exposed to covid, yet never had any test or conclusive symptoms. I’m also confident that people like me do not experience problems from covid. At least not any more problems than a flu. A 1/3000 risk of myo
36.
by vibrato2 5y ago
Did you miss the part of the fda statement this week where they said they have no long term data available?
37.
by vibrato2 5y ago
Consider the realistic uncertainty and probability from previous study of antibody dependent enhancement. It’s not proven that the mRNA therapy won’t worsen covid reaction in the long run.
38.
by vibrato2 5y ago
Working very viably for myself.
39.
by vibrato2 5y ago
Good point to follow the money. There have been a lot of unsubstantiated claims about lack of side effects from the mRNA therapies, while at the same time they became the most profitable drugs of all time even before approval.
40.
by vibrato2 5y ago
Cannabidiol, which also shows about an order of magnitude decrease in covid infections from this study. Another promising therapeutic. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7987002/
41.
by vibrato2 5y ago
No, I’m not saying that. I’m saying your number is bad for a specific reason. I also never said no one’s died of covid. If you wanted to see that data I’m sure you’d find it. Actuaries do this kind of work.
42.
by vibrato2 5y ago
Simply put, there's an extraordinary number of people becoming old at this exact time. The baby boomers. Any "excess" death calculation which doesn't account for this natural spike in death is not comprehensive whatsoeve
43.
by vibrato2 5y ago
His number is based on a naive death count year over year. When the death rate is normalized for population age distribution his "excess" shrinks to near 0.