veidr

42 ms·

451.
by veidr 3y ago
We meant name shared values, not politicians. Free speech? Free markets? Those are good examples of values, if a little vague. But in reality, even with broad definitions of them, I doubt you could get a significantly different percentage t
452.
by veidr 3y ago
I dunno man, I think you are getting tripped up on the evolution of the English language. Yes, your kids are either male or female (mine are all male). Those fundamental physical characteristics can't be changed by language. But what l
453.
by veidr 3y ago
Since you seem quite sure of that, can you name twenty of them?
454.
by veidr 3y ago
Thanks, very interesting read. And interesting times! "Take the uncensored, dangerous model down or I will inform [your employer's] HR about what you've created."
455.
by veidr 3y ago
I get: "The dog species typically has two sexes: male and female." UPDATE: OK I signed up for Bard to try it, too, and it indeed did mention intersex dogs (TIL) and gender (complete response below). After reading it all, though, I
456.
by veidr 3y ago
I think you may be assuming a much larger overlap of shared values than actually exists.
457.
by veidr 3y ago
Totally bro! Let me just post that to this public internet forum for you... UPDATE: No, that was a joke. I was referring to imagery, which fictional or not can definitely be illegal in the USA even if you draw it yourself in your private jo
458.
by veidr 3y ago
Well, I mean, def not a fan of putting people to death for blasphemy, but... how does that make thinking of the US laws a "mistake"?
459.
by veidr 3y ago
OP is talking about visual imagery, but even textual depictions may not be as legally safe as you think. Further reading: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_status_of_fictional_porn...
460.
by veidr 3y ago
Probably lots of places, but certainly the USA, for instance.
461.
by veidr 3y ago
Can you tell us more about using a Steam Deck this way? Do you often use the terminal (or something like VS Code Remote extension) to do builds on a beefier machine, or do you do all your development literally on the SteamDeck hardware usin
462.
by veidr 3y ago
I click through every formatter-related post because I am looking for something better than what I have. My team at work wanted to use Prettier, but lack of configurability (and also heinous bugs!) made me switch to dprint[1]. But even dpri
463.
by veidr 3y ago
I don't get your central point. What is different about now compared to 5 years ago, when it comes to a code linter and/or bundler? At first glance, I thought you were saying "this Rome thing might have been relevant 5 years
464.
by veidr 3y ago
Indeed. I think we’ve gotten a lot closer in the past few years though (after wanting this for almost 20 years without progress). Rust’s language service (optionally) adds phantom code to several modern editors, showing inferred types in th
465.
by veidr 3y ago
I initially had this same reaction. Well, perhaps less stridently assembled, but my initial take on it was the same: that ligatures for coding fonts were objectively dumb. But, I was wrong. In several years of using them now, there has neve
466.
by veidr 3y ago
Yep, that’s even more important than ligatures. :)
467.
by veidr 3y ago
My understanding is that both font and editor must support it; the editor must know when/how to render the ligatures, but the font must define what the glyphs look like, or else they won’t look any different that the regular sequence o
468.
by veidr 3y ago
Looks very readable, but for me personally, ligatures for things like ->, =>, <=, >= and those weird JavaScriptisms like == vs === has really become table stakes for me. Didn't care about that at all until about 2020, but c
469.
by veidr 3y ago
Me too. I mean I use several browsers at the same time, but Brave has become the "main" browser I use for all my personal browsing (work shit, I leave in Chrome). But the thing is I don't like Brave, either. I don't li
470.
by veidr 3y ago
not unless you don't get any other money
471.
by veidr 3y ago
Thanks! I stand corrected, a little embarrassed, but also somewhat relieved :-P Sam Altman's real twitter is: @sama
472.
by veidr 3y ago
That's true (that this will be an interesting litmus test) but I doubt it can be seen so quickly. Almost everybody went remote 3 years ago (though some were already), and now the dinosaurs (but maybe also lots of imitate-the-big-guys
473.
by veidr 3y ago
I came to this thread ready to say that this guy is a moron (and I'm still withholding judgement on that[1]) but there is a fundamental truth here: you have to be good at the tooling. Meet/Zoom/Mmhmm whatever; they aren&#x27
474.
by veidr 3y ago
I know that's your point, but I don't understand why you think that. Even with your own theoretical additions to what the programs above need, none of the programs above actually need "all" access enabled. And even when
475.
by veidr 3y ago
I know this doesn't directly address your specific scenario, with the '.js' import. But there is a similar situation that got a lot better with TypeScript 5. For a long time I was annoyed by the similar problem of Deno's
476.
by veidr 3y ago
Well they might not be your use cases, but surely you can imagine them, right? A build tool, that reads input files and writes output files, and nothing else. A CLI that interacts with the bug tracker, and needs to read the environment and
477.
by veidr 3y ago
Wild take, but agree with your first sentence. 1.) it was never a language 2.) indisputably better security any time you take advantage of any of the features to disable reading of environment variables, using network, reading files, etc.
478.
by veidr 3y ago
Precisely. So much of the negativity in this thread (and elsewhere) weirdly conflates Deno with a language . Deno is an open source runtime for TypeScript (and JavaScript and WASM). One that has been delightful, in my experience, for syste
479.
by veidr 4y ago
More "some" than "incredible". But the result is yet to be seen.
480.
by veidr 4y ago
My instance laughed (^_^)

More ›