Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
veddox
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
51 ms
·
511.
▲
by
veddox
9y ago
I don't think the authors are native speakers, let's forgive them for that ;-)
512.
▲
by
veddox
9y ago
This whole study strikes me as rather weak, I wouldn't give assign too much importance to the results. As mentioned below, the number of participants was rather low (though that is not uncommon in the life sciences and medicine). Also,
513.
▲
by
veddox
9y ago
The study doesn't say whether red meat is "good" or "bad", just that eating red meat correlated (within their study group) with shorter telomere lengths. Telomeres are caps at the end of the chromosomes that serve a
514.
▲
by
veddox
9y ago
Put simply: if you test a random event often enough, you're going to get lucky eventually. In statistics, the question everybody asks is whether or not a given result is "significant". To answer this question, one calculates
515.
▲
by
veddox
9y ago
I'm sorry, I really can't follow your line of reasoning here. Could you elucidate?
516.
▲
by
veddox
9y ago
This strikes me as a very hyped article. "It’s like Einstein’s theory of relativity, but for viruses" - seriously?! While the proposed explanation for differing rates of evolution is doubtlessly interesting from a scientific persp
517.
▲
by
veddox
9y ago
I like the idea, but I am afraid that as long as there are no "big names" behind it, it isn't going to make much headway in the conservative world of science. As tough as it sounds: reputation is the currency of science, and
518.
▲
by
veddox
9y ago
> What, if anything, will come after Facebook for human connection? "If anything"? I can pretty much guarantee you that in 50 years (or 100, to stay on the safe side), nobody will be using Facebook anymore. The question is not
519.
▲
by
veddox
9y ago
Excellent comment, I couldn't agree more! Just two things to add: For general language skills, find authors who have good style and read as much of their work as you can. They might be well-known book authors (I personally enjoy CS Lew
520.
▲
by
veddox
10y ago
Oh wow! Thanks for sharing that!
521.
▲
by
veddox
10y ago
> (Except this is Europe, where a hundred years is not a particularly long time...) Precisely what we mean ;-)
522.
▲
by
veddox
10y ago
> Tying in the US seems a bit forced here. Absolutely. Obviously the Civil War did play a role (there's nothing in history that isn't connected in some way), but trying to set it up as a major cause of WW1+2? No thanks. To me
523.
▲
by
veddox
10y ago
Nobody is asking France to return Alsace-Lorraine, but in a historical article, one might expect at least a footnote to say that this wasn't just French territory! And I don't think the comparison with Texas is all that fitting:
524.
▲
by
veddox
10y ago
I don't think you understand the extent of the distrust and resentment that existed between the French and the Germans. It goes back much further than 1871. You could probably go back to the Middle Ages, but let's start with Napol
525.
▲
by
veddox
10y ago
I use my initials when I'm getting to grips with a new code base. It's not for committing, just as an aid when I'm jumping around following the code.
526.
▲
by
veddox
10y ago
Yeah, that's the way I've been using it too: FIXME - something is there, but it doesn't work TODO - something that needs to be there but isn't yet XXX - something is there and works, but should be cleaned up.
527.
▲
by
veddox
10y ago
Short answer: code them ;-) Long answer: The Algorithms and Data Structures course is one of the foundational courses of a CS degree. Even if you think you don't need to be able to implement the algorithms you learn in your work later
528.
▲
by
veddox
10y ago
Given a hacker collective of sufficient size, know-how, resources and time, perhaps. (Even though they might end up destroying half of civilization themselves in the process...) Seriously, no. Aside from the fact that war is in essence a so
529.
▲
by
veddox
10y ago
About two years ago I stumbled across Paul Graham's essays and started reading my way through them. One of them was "What I've learned from Hacker News" ( http://www.paulgraham.com/hackernews.html )... Tha
530.
▲
by
veddox
10y ago
1. Your page took almost a minute to load. 2. What does your platform offer that I can't already get via Twitter? 3. You talk about the service being "free of media bias". But what about the bias of the people reporting your
531.
▲
by
veddox
10y ago
A fascinating article, thank you for sharing!
532.
▲
by
veddox
10y ago
Can you give a reference for that number? Sounds intriguing...
533.
▲
by
veddox
10y ago
Check their help page here: https://duck.co/help/settings/regions
534.
▲
by
veddox
10y ago
Ecosia has a great business model, if I wasn't already a dedicated DDG user I would switch straight away...
535.
▲
by
veddox
10y ago
> Earlier this year I made the conscious decision to remove all Internet service from my home. It ended up being the best productivity decision I’ve ever made. Yep, can confirm that. I haven't had any Internet in my student flat in
536.
▲
by
veddox
10y ago
Yea, I think it passed that mark a long time ago.
537.
▲
by
veddox
10y ago
A similar example comes to mind from Stephen E. Ambrose's book "Band of Brothers". He interviewed WW2 veterans who talked about how every soldier going into combat for the first time believes that he's going to survive.
538.
▲
by
veddox
10y ago
I would attribute a lot of that to survivorship bias - we usually only hear about successes. (Nobody likes to talk about failures.) That leaves us with the impression that successes are a lot more common than they really are. Also, hope and
539.
▲
by
veddox
10y ago
1. Be interested in the person standing opposite you, show real empathy. 2. Listen to what they say. 3. Try to understand why they say what they say; if necessary, ask questions. 4. If you ask questions, ask open-ended questions. ("Why
540.
▲
by
veddox
10y ago
> Online conversation is usually vastly better than "water cooler" conversation IRL where people typically say nothing of real importance. Usually, the point of conversation isn't to "say something of importance"
More ›