vb-8448

3 ms·

1.
by vb-8448 5d ago
Definitely not a musk fan, but what exact is your point? Other big labs aren't innocent little virgins.
2.
by vb-8448 5d ago
They want transparency from everyone else but not for them ... you don't say.
3.
by vb-8448 7d ago
They just care much more about their user's data.
4.
by vb-8448 7d ago
I heard some of their employees sent to do some PR in podcasts: they are definitively disconnected from the reality. Maybe internally they see really unbelievable things, but my impression is that they pushed so hard on agents that they don
5.
by vb-8448 8d ago
They have AGI, but they don't have $20 of token budget to add a so basic functionality.
6.
by vb-8448 9d ago
1: There are corner cases, no doubt, but the main source of information should remain near the code. 2 & 3: How to be sure that the agent will pick the "append only hint" from the memory? Especially when it starts growing and
7.
by vb-8448 9d ago
But how you are going to link the "keep this logical path ..." with the code? You cannot feed all the memory to the agent because of the context rot, and you are not sure the agent will always pick it when needed.
8.
by vb-8448 9d ago
> Global memory I don't get why we need global memory for code? Aren't code comments (even if invented for humans) the ideal place where to put "memories"?
9.
by vb-8448 9d ago
Isn't this against TOS of OAI?
10.
by vb-8448 9d ago
The problem is that Pi, on any third party harness, cannot really compete with codex or cc due to subscriptions.
11.
by vb-8448 9d ago
Even better: force them to release weights.
12.
by vb-8448 11d ago
I'd argue that those traces MUST be made public!
13.
by vb-8448 12d ago
Yeah, the compute is definitively another way to make them slow down, just cap the amount of TFLOPS available and things will slow down. Obviously this will have huge impact on some companies valuations, but you can have one's cake and
14.
by vb-8448 12d ago
It doesn't have to propagate itself, that is the skynet scenario. To make a lot of damage it's enough to create a ransomware with a time bomb that self propagates and start breaching systems left and right. At that point, if you d
15.
by vb-8448 12d ago
> “a swarm of agents could be capable of taking over the entire internet with a persistent botnet.” I'm wondering why no one is mentioning the "accountability" word. Why these companies are allowed to damage others with im
16.
by vb-8448 13d ago
> Historically, many of these problems were bottlenecked by human attention. Someone had to care enough to spend hours or days reading obscure material, testing unpromising ideas, tracing references, and trying things that might go nowhe
17.
by vb-8448 13d ago
Everyone agreeing on something is not even possible on small local scales, just imagine the situation on a global scale. It's not a challenge at all because it's not possible, it's just empty rhetoric to push their own agenda
18.
by vb-8448 13d ago
My experience up to now is that the models can do both "less LOC" and "clean code" at the same time, you just have to keep reminding it to them. So the capabilities are definitively there.
19.
by vb-8448 13d ago
> The models do not have a fear of future regret. I so much feel this specific point. All models up to now (including astra, fable) are too much trained to "get the job done" and pass the benchmark that its doesn't care at
20.
by vb-8448 13d ago
Debt cost is high since some time, going public probably is just cheaper. Anyway, any evidence for "prices are moving inference to highly profitable" because they are still selling $20 for $1 with their subscriptions.
21.
by vb-8448 14d ago
If the alignment is such a problem ... why not using self-improving capabilities of the latest models to solve it?
22.
by vb-8448 14d ago
If there were really concerned about humanity future they'd donate everything to public and/or to not profits ... but the not profit turned in a for profit and the other one is seeking for the biggest IPO in history. Maybe they ar
23.
by vb-8448 15d ago
The only difference with the past that you need less time to dig through the codebase or documentation, the agent can do it for you and provide only meaningful info, but without a "Mental model"(or knowing what's going under
24.
by vb-8448 16d ago
The future is basically something between: AGI/ASI will kill us all and a privacy nightmare.
25.
by vb-8448 16d ago
So basically I record what the browser sends to the server when I click the toggle and the server response? I wonder how I can attach a timestamp that cannot be faked.
26.
by vb-8448 16d ago
Out of curiosity, how one is supposed to "document it properly"?
27.
by vb-8448 17d ago
Tower Bridge suits you? But hurry up, there are a lot of pretenders.
28.
by vb-8448 17d ago
If you trust a "toggle" I have a bridge to sell. Users data is just too precious to ignore.
29.
by vb-8448 17d ago
> While unlikely, we cannot rule out that de-identified data derived from their usage of our products helped improve our models AKA everything you send to them (and I bet it's the same for any other lab) will be used, no matter what
30.
by vb-8448 21d ago
Same experience here, but I have some strange feeling. Sol I'm used to working a month ago doesn't feel the same I'm using today, slower and less accurate. My gut feeling is that they quantize previous models to prioritize ne

More ›