vasco

5 ms·

31.
by vasco 1mo ago
You've been on HN for 16 years and still comment the lowest brow possible comment on security vulnerability threads that the bounty isn't big enough. How many times do we need to have a top comment crying about the same thing? If
32.
by vasco 1mo ago
It definitely is easier to comment on what you make up than what was written, but don't be lazy.
33.
by vasco 1mo ago
Not just nutrition, over the last ~30 years there's also been a philosophical shift globally where many people went from thinking about impact on humans as the only thing to assess, to considering the impact on the wider ecosystems. To
34.
by vasco 1mo ago
You can know all the whats and hows and still have no clue about why
35.
by vasco 1mo ago
If your answer is that the AI will not do what either prompter wants but what it's own definition of alignment is I hope you know that leads into terminator.
36.
by vasco 1mo ago
Humans are not aligned with each other so who should the AI align with? There's many wars going on, just pick one and do your thought exercise with AI aligned 100% to their human prompters. Which side does the AI refuse to help?
37.
by vasco 1mo ago
What conspiracy mate? It's not so deep, I was curious if what he said was a lie due to the downvotes and found nice evidence for it. You don't find it convincing it's your choice, but the dude didn't pull it out of his a
38.
by vasco 1mo ago
Since you are getting no replies but getting downvoted I'm adding source from 2016 corroborating what you mention: https://www.techtransparencyproject.org/articles/googles-rev... 251 individuals in such detected i
39.
by vasco 1mo ago
Nobody is offended. I'm also not a native speaker.
40.
by vasco 1mo ago
Well this goes into the debate of "is morality absolute or relative" which gets religious fast and there's more books on the subject than we have time to read.
41.
by vasco 1mo ago
You misread that comment so much that I'm not sure going too deep here matters much.
42.
by vasco 1mo ago
> We cannot have "dead hands" dictating how future generations should live and work The whole world is dictated by dead hands. I cannot walk around pristine forests (maybe I even need to pre-register), I need to deal with burea
43.
by vasco 1mo ago
> I suspect he's relying on people's eyes glazing over when they see numbers and just not thinking about what the numbers mean. This is one of the most important learnings one can make from working in professional environments.
44.
by vasco 1mo ago
Based on all evidence so far Sam Altman has negative scruples so I'm pretty sure this would be incentivised if anything.
45.
by vasco 1mo ago
Checks and balances are the result of agents having different goals. If they all had the same goals they wouldn't need to agree on rules of operations, they'd just paperclip their way to the goal. AI is going to be controlled by h
46.
by vasco 1mo ago
What they do is create content to spam the rest if us.
47.
by vasco 1mo ago
What you said might be true and yet what OPs AI agent did wasn't measure latency of the service nor calculated a p99 for it.
48.
by vasco 1mo ago
My only point is in a many agent system with different goals it "doesn't matter" that some agents have bad goals as long as there's enough variability of goals and resources that they can't put their vision in place
49.
by vasco 1mo ago
As long as there's enough of them with different goals it doesn't matter, they'll keep each other in check. The worlds resources are already handed over to the worst people and we're still doing fine and none of the bill
50.
by vasco 1mo ago
> discussed by intellectuals in the tech space Not to burst your bubble but registrations are open to the public here on HN.
51.
by vasco 1mo ago
If your boss asks for X feature and you split it into 4 PRs, 3 that implement X and a 4th that fixes a security bug, how would they know? Someone that uses those 30mins like that isn't reviewing your PRs themselves. Just fix it and be
52.
by vasco 1mo ago
Too expensive, bad idea.
53.
by vasco 1mo ago
The sarcasm was pretty funny so it has some utility, no need to be so serious
54.
by vasco 1mo ago
> Real-time democracy running a business This is not a competitive advantage
55.
by vasco 1mo ago
What funds it is besides the point, you didn't understand.
56.
by vasco 1mo ago
The public
57.
by vasco 1mo ago
Rewards are paid out for transactions, not interest paid, that's all. Otherwise poor people failing payments would get more rewards than the rich which don't. The dynamics would be completely different.
58.
by vasco 1mo ago
Yes that is true, and what I said is also true.
59.
by vasco 1mo ago
It has no relation to paying interest, only to making transactions with the credit card.
60.
by vasco 1mo ago
No, don't think too much because you'll be sad. Better to pretend its just dumb tasty meat.

More ›