Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
varjag
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
33 ms
·
841.
▲
by
varjag
2y ago
Most recent is the two kids of exchanged Russian spies who learned they are not Argentinians while on the plane to Moscow.
842.
▲
by
varjag
2y ago
When I signed up on Twitter in 2009 these ToS in no way implied using my tweets as training data. Nor they are worded explicitly that way now either.
843.
▲
by
varjag
2y ago
There were numerous bridge collapses without casualties. Naturally if one company could suddenly collapse 80% of Earth's bridges, direct deaths would be assured. It's great there isn't one for some reason!
844.
▲
by
varjag
2y ago
I doubt it was competitive at any point. Setun had not demonstrated any practical edge in its generation and noone tried to reproduce it afterwards.
845.
▲
by
varjag
2y ago
I know what it meant for but the evidence for its efficacy is thin.
846.
▲
by
varjag
2y ago
This article contains content that is written like an advertisement. (June 2020)
847.
▲
by
varjag
2y ago
One extremely common pitfall is that attempts to build dev teams in non-tech companies end up creating a clique of "big thinkers" who unfortunately can't code much themselves. They end up convincing the management to contract
848.
▲
by
varjag
2y ago
Ternary is one of several crackpotry schools that were established in USSR. You'd have them write books on the subjects, rant in tech magazines… there even was an SF short story about evil alien robots defeated by ternary. Another big
849.
▲
Ray Cat
(en.wikipedia.org)
1 points
by
varjag
2y ago
|
0 comments
850.
▲
by
varjag
2y ago
Honestly if we can take one conclusion from current events, is this handwringing about military procurement is largely melodramatic. As it turned out Bradley fighting vehicle absolutely kicks ass despite a whole movie filmed to narrate how
851.
▲
by
varjag
2y ago
The 787 was Boeing's own commercial project, what does it have to do with cost plus?
852.
▲
by
varjag
2y ago
Fascinating. An anachronism worthy of steampunk novels!
853.
▲
by
varjag
2y ago
I remember Tulip could handle pretty huge ones, though no idea if it can manage billions. https://tulip.labri.fr/site/
854.
▲
by
varjag
2y ago
This is why Lenat and CYC had settled on micro-theories. They found it impossible to build a useful universal ontology so had to fracture them on domain boundaries.
855.
▲
by
varjag
2y ago
There's a distance from knowing Python enough to find your way around in projects to knowing it enough to solve coding riddles. The latter requires the level of familiarity attained only with regular use. Plenty developers go by their
856.
▲
by
varjag
2y ago
There's been some overlap naturally, e.g. Yershov or Hopper attending both types events early on. But hardly any of content in say TAoCP was considered AI at any point.
857.
▲
by
varjag
2y ago
Not types, functions. Where the macro is essentially a forward declaration but the implementation is deep inside the code and is not exposed via headers.
858.
▲
by
varjag
2y ago
Bindings generators exist in most other languages with same limitations. I would love to see how bindgen would handle a function call defined as a preprocessor macro that I mentioned. Because most likely it won't.
859.
▲
by
varjag
2y ago
Now imagine a hundred or two functions, structures and callbacks, some of them exposed only as CPP macros over internal implementation. PJSIP low level API is one example.
860.
▲
by
varjag
2y ago
How well does it handle preprocessor macros in APIs?
861.
▲
by
varjag
2y ago
They quickly become unwieldy on non-trivial APIs, with hundreds of definitions across dozens of files and with macros to boot. Naturally people would still get the job done but it's beyond simple.
862.
▲
by
varjag
2y ago
That's not really "simple", it's on par with C FFI in about any other language (except C++), with same drawbacks.
863.
▲
by
varjag
2y ago
No, not really. If you compare proceedings of even the earliest AI and CS conferences it is clearly not the case.
864.
▲
by
varjag
2y ago
Historically however AI didn't mean a neural net specifically.
865.
▲
by
varjag
2y ago
With change in leadership to GenXers and millennials I don't think it's an expectation really.
866.
▲
by
varjag
2y ago
It is true. Stage 3 used to be a death sentence in early 1990s. It is survivable now for most kinds of cancer.
867.
▲
by
varjag
2y ago
It was there 8 years ago.
868.
▲
by
varjag
2y ago
> if this were true we wouldn't have spam I was replying to the comment asserting that dealing with email spam is easier, which it most resolutely wasn't until the advent of statistical filters. > A) this is insanely naïve g
869.
▲
by
varjag
2y ago
Not sure about the calls, since apparently millennials and zoomers never pick up.
870.
▲
by
varjag
2y ago
Well neither IBM is doing much in terms of business machines lately. They are still a second tier giant with enormous turnover. They own a few pieces of popular tech either via acquisitions or licensing agreements but none that came from wi
More ›