vapg1974

2 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by vapg1974 1y ago

   "A majority women group may be more rational, competitive, or risk-seeking (all values she attributes as more likely to appear in groups of men), but it depends on the women in the group. She already admits that individual characterist
2. 2.▲
   by vapg1974 1y ago

   Just like reducating young boys to act as women since that behaviour is deemed the only acceptable, while all "diversity" is referred to melanin, clothing and attractions,
3. 3.▲
   by vapg1974 1y ago

   That reminds me all the armies of women go passive-aggressive when hings don't go their way.
4. 4.▲
   by vapg1974 1y ago

   So philosophically a 48yo, 6ft4 and 200lbs man can be taken as a 5ft4 90lbs woman. That means if I repeat "Charmander" enough times, it will socially construct itself in this reality.
5. 5.▲
   by vapg1974 1y ago

   The idea that there are straightforward “female” and “male” traits should seem quite shaky to anyone who is even a little bit into humanities... "Humanities", that alone makes your whole argument invalid. As if brain configuation,