vanusa

21 ms·

181.
by vanusa 5y ago
https://archive.fo/hy8pO
182.
Why Does the Demolition of a Marcel Breuer House Matter?(nytimes.com)
3 points by vanusa 5y ago|1 comments
183.
by vanusa 5y ago
Is the threat of violence an issue for you, otherwise? Or is it overblown?
184.
by vanusa 5y ago
I'm just going to comment in this aspect: Now I feel too old to go to festivals, bars and clubs and make new friends that way. Don't know where you live, but in NYC and certain other cities the the bars and clubs (depending whic
185.
by vanusa 5y ago
I did not express myself well. And now it has gone down on my permanent record. Had I only listened to my teachers more, when it still mattered.
186.
by vanusa 5y ago
That wasn't really necessary? Perhaps not. I guess what I'm trying to say is: Yes, it's a woefully underappreciated and underpaid job. But unlike what must of us fully-hatched adults do with our lives - I do feel that (go
187.
by vanusa 5y ago
Nothing to do with disagreement. It's pretty obvious from what the two of them have been saying on the public record. Sorry to be blunt - if you take these guys seriously (let alone as "domain experts"), you're terribly
188.
by vanusa 5y ago
I was a fine piece, to be sure. The point is, it's customary to append that the title (so people aren't drawn into clicking on the article as if it's something new).
189.
by vanusa 5y ago
Both are certifiable cranks. No matter what they published in the past.
190.
by vanusa 5y ago
2017
191.
by vanusa 5y ago
I see what you're driving at -- but on balance I just don't see a slippery slope here. Whether the executive branch is technically entitled to make such pronouncements or not -- or whether they "should" -- their rational
192.
by vanusa 5y ago
I certainly don't listen his program on a regular basis. But it's ironic that you're calling me out as unsourced; because the most important instance of a harmful anti-vax stance on his program comes not from his "domai
193.
by vanusa 5y ago
Again, who decides what is harmful? Anyone with a 9th grade education or so. Which is sufficient to discern that his advice to 21-year olds as to whether they should get vaccinated is patently unsubstantiated -- and likely to cause harm.
194.
by vanusa 5y ago
Because there's no substance to these "challenges". It's just about pushing buttons and creating the appearance of controversy - nothing more. It seems like only people who correctly challenge it get respected. It&#x27
195.
by vanusa 5y ago
Except that Rogan's program isn't about "unpopular ideas" or "inconvenient facts". Let alone "challenging prevailing orthodoxy". If you seriously think Rogan's content falls in that category -
196.
by vanusa 5y ago
Everything you need to know about Amazon, on one sentence: After Carrie Goldberg, a lawyer for Ms. Scott, wrote to Amazon’s general counsel and implored the company to remove the product from its platform, lawyers for Amazon pointed out a
197.
by vanusa 5y ago
Maybe you were ungrateful. I am extremely grateful for the talents of several of my public school teachers (and until they were downsized) counselors.
198.
by vanusa 5y ago
This may be a (very sloppy) overfit or some other kind of error on Apple's part. It is difficult to parse the official sanctions directives - but from my understanding they target only certain individuals and institutions - not the cou
199.
by vanusa 5y ago
OK, let me try again: "If your local 7-Eleven had Oui and Hustler on its racks last week, but they are gone this week, it has been censored." I would argue: "No - 7-Eleven either decided just those titles weren't sel
200.
by vanusa 5y ago
Basically what Jordan was saying was an extremely obvious misinterpretation of what Lorenz was actually saying. In other words: nonsense, not even qualifying as "controversial".
201.
by vanusa 5y ago
"If the New Coke was available on the shelves to my local supermarket yesterday but is entirely unavailable today, it has been censored." I would argue: "No - either the supermarket, or Coca-Cola decided it wasn't sellin
202.
by vanusa 5y ago
I don't disagree with you, Uh, plainly you do . The commenter's main point was that what the broadcaster did was not censorship (and whoever calls it that "need a reality check"). You're saying it "still
203.
by vanusa 5y ago
Title edit: YC
204.
by vanusa 5y ago
I know this is basically a doomer piece. But unfortunately it also echoes what friends who have been working in ER environments the whole time have been telling me.
205.
As Omicron peaks, the US healthcare system is left ‘broken beyond repair’(theguardian.com)
6 points by vanusa 5y ago|1 comments
206.
by vanusa 5y ago
You're being a glass-half-empty person. Actually it's worse than that: you're being extremely hyperbolic in your condemnation of this research. I see health research a giant jigsaw puzzle (on top of other kinds of puzzles) -
207.
by vanusa 5y ago
Yes, they're possible -- but it's high-expense operation, intended to be used "infrequently". Which may or may not impact their use case. Just something to be aware of.
208.
by vanusa 5y ago
The thing is these tools don't track people; they track planes. And only planes. You don't know who was in the plane, or where they were before or after the flight.
209.
by vanusa 5y ago
Because barely edible and slow-poisoning food isn't a bug of the American prison system -- it's a feature. In, they're proud of the "whitebread and baloney" diet they feed these people. Not that vegan food can&#x27
210.
by vanusa 5y ago
Wonder no more: https://archive.fo/QVgGH

More ›