3 ms·
I certainly don't listen his program on a regular basis. But it's ironic that you're calling me out as unsourced; because the most important instance of a harm
by vanusa 5y ago
I certainly don't listen his program on a regular basis. But it's ironic that you're calling me out as unsourced; because the most important instance of a harmful anti-vax stance on his program comes not from his "domain experts" but from Rogan himself (as I verified before diving into this thread).
BTW, I just need to repeat that most curious phrase you used that phrase, presumably in reference to Rogan's guests: "domain experts".
And just let it... sit there.
- ALittleLight 5y agoThe recent vaccine-focused episodes, to my knowledge, feature the guests Robert Malone and Pierre Kory. Both are medical doctors with a history of academic papers on vaccines and critical care. Malone has also been involved in vaccine safety trials and with pioneering research in mRNA vaccines. I think you need to do a bit more than let the phrase "Domain experts" "sit there" if you hope to be persuasive.
- vanusa 5y agoBoth are certifiable cranks. No matter what they published in the past.
- ALittleLight 5y agoIt seems an awful lot like you're just declaring, without evidence, people who disagree with you as cranks. You think your view should be obvious, but you also aren't able to articulate it very well, or at all - beyond asserting your point and that those who disagree with you are non-substantive cranks.
- vanusa 5y agoNothing to do with disagreement. It's pretty obvious from what the two of them have been saying on the public record. Sorry to be blunt - if you take these guys seriously (let alone as "domain experts"), you're terribly naive. You're being played, and played very hard.
- ALittleLight 5y agoIn the spirit of being blunt medical doctors specializing in vaccines and critical care are, by definition, domain experts in the domains of vaccination and critical care.