vantagedesign

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by vantagedesign 6y ago

   Could you check how it is now? (With a cleared cache :) )
2. 2.▲
   by vantagedesign 6y ago

   I've pushed some changes to the demo that should optimize the animations on the page. It's hard for me to test it when not experiencing the issues myself, so could you try how it feels for you now?
3. 3.▲
   by vantagedesign 6y ago

   I partially agree with you. The demo page is for both the free (open source, MIT license) version and the Pro version. Just for the sake of simplicity and to show that there's more if people want that, but its not forced anywhere. I mi
4. 4.▲
   by vantagedesign 6y ago

   The license in the repo is a mistake and should be fixed soon. I probably mixed up the files. But yeah, the standard free part of the design system already offers a lot and is fully open source and MIT licensed. If you feel like there'
5. 5.▲
   by vantagedesign 6y ago

   Fair point, I'll try to include that on the page! Thanks for your feedback :)
6. 6.▲
   by vantagedesign 6y ago

   The normal version is free, which includess a lot of components. If you want more, there's a Pro version which is paid. But the free version is open source and already quite extensive to use :)
7. 7.▲
   by vantagedesign 6y ago

   Could be it, I'm on a i7-4770K with Win10 and Firefox and no lag at all anywhere. I don't have a Mac so I can't test it on MacOS I'm afraid..
8. 8.▲
   by vantagedesign 6y ago

   That's so weird. For me it's all butter smooth, and I'm on a 6+ year old desktop with Firefox.
9. 9.▲
   by vantagedesign 6y ago

   Thanks for your feedback. It's really weird though because for me on a laptop, everything is butter smooth. Even the parallax in the header. So I wouldn't know where those performance issues originate from. Would you know a way to
10. 10.▲
    by vantagedesign 6y ago

    Fair point, I'll that that into account and see what I can do. Thanks for your feedback
11. 11.▲
    by vantagedesign 6y ago

    Thank you for your feedback. I agree, and I plan to fix that in an upcoming update :)
12. 12.▲
    by vantagedesign 6y ago

    Thanks! Will definitely take that into account and fix that. I plan on making it more accessible in the next update, including some screen reader only labels and such.
13. 13.▲
    by vantagedesign 6y ago

    Thanks! I agree, and this was done intentionally. The free version offers a solid and complete foundation for most projects. The pro version offers that extra edge of functionality, along with templates for sections and pages. Think of the
14. 14.▲
    by vantagedesign 6y ago

    They shouldn't be the same price: as soon as you select a license it updates the price. Do you have JavaScript enabled? Perhaps my ecommerce software is a bit wonky in that regard, and I'd love to know more about your situation so
15. 15.▲
    by vantagedesign 6y ago

    I personally like them and I think many people do. Nevertheless, I'm curious to what you do like. What would you like to see?
16. 16.▲
    by vantagedesign 6y ago

    Okay I'll see if I can apply that fix in a future update, thanks! It's probably a Chrome specific thing then.
17. 17.▲
    by vantagedesign 6y ago

    Hmm strange. I'm on a Galaxy S8 with Chrome and I only notice a slight lag with the parallax elements. The other elements all seem to function very smoothly. I'll look into it and see what I can find! Thank you :)
18. 18.▲
    by vantagedesign 6y ago

    Thank you! Appreciate that feedback, I'll look into that. Sounds like it might be a good tweak to the styling. However, I also like it when a button, even when disabled, may still convey meaning of success, for example. So that I know
19. 19.▲
    by vantagedesign 6y ago

    Okay thanks I'm going to check it out. I think some browsers add an outline to indicate it being selected, it might be that. I believe Firefox has a slightly visible dotted line around each element.
20. 20.▲
    by vantagedesign 6y ago

    Fixed, thank you! Kinda ashamed of all these spelling errors.. lol
21. 21.▲
    by vantagedesign 6y ago

    Thanks! Nope, it's not. And I've never seen it before so I don't know where it could come from. What browser are you using?
22. 22.▲
    by vantagedesign 6y ago

    Thanks! Fixed it
23. 23.▲
    by vantagedesign 6y ago

    Oops :) Fixed! Thank you for pointing this out
24. 24.▲
    by vantagedesign 6y ago

    Yes, I have looked at the WebAim WAVE accessibility report and that's something I'm going to address with an update soon. Though, I do not believe all contrast issues are a huge problem in all cases. Thanks for that link, will che
25. 25.▲
    by vantagedesign 6y ago

    Yep, I am aware of that. Going to fix it asap! Thanks :) EDIT: it's fixed!
26. 26.▲
    by vantagedesign 6y ago

    Thanks! For tags I'm using "Bootstrap 4 Tags Input", and for select I'm using "bootstrap-select". I've custom styled these plugins to fit them in perfectly with the design language of the system :)
27. 27.▲
    by vantagedesign 6y ago

    Hi all! I'd love to know what you think of this design system. Feedback is highly appreciated and will be taken into account for future updates!
28. 28.▲
    by vantagedesign 6y ago

    I agree! Though Bootstrap 4 uses jQuery for its plugins so I figured why not. BS5 will get rid of jQuery, and I plan on doing the same when updating this design system for BS5 :)
29. 29.▲
    Show HN: Solid, a free and MIT licensed design system / UI kit for Bootstrap 4(docs.vantage-design.com)

    94 points by vantagedesign 6y ago|70 comments
30. 30.▲
    Show HN: Free agency/business landing page template for Bootstrap 4(docs.vantage-design.com)

    1 points by vantagedesign 7y ago|0 comments