valine

15 ms·

241.
by valine 3y ago
If it’s crewed is it still a drone?
242.
An ongoing effort to reproduce LK-99(twitter.com)
2 points by valine 3y ago|0 comments
243.
by valine 3y ago
That seems like a real step in the direction of AGI but not anywhere near the full solution. The current context windows are far too small to replicate human intelligence. I can’t quite put my finger on it but it feels like we are missing a
244.
by valine 3y ago
I don't think its even necessary to pick up the wire. The newest vacuums use cameras to try to avoid common obstacles, but the image classification is so rudimentary they get stuck anyway. Having the common sense to stay away from the
245.
by valine 3y ago
Most of the algorithms we use in machine learning are chosen specifically because they parallelize well. If we could increase clock speeds arbitrarily high, a huge selection of algorithms we passed on would suddenly become viable.
246.
by valine 3y ago
GPT4 is more difficult to measure I think. The value I get from GPT4 is in the details it gets right on very obscure, complex questions. I'm not sure benchmarks are capturing how far GPT4 is ahead of other models. For simple stuff it&#
247.
by valine 3y ago
I believe it needs a minimum of 48 hours in the furnace. If labs started right away after the paper hit Arxiv we should be hearing about results soon.
248.
by valine 3y ago
It would be a really dumb scam. The paper is allegedly easy to reproduce. It’ll be proven or disproven in short order, where’s the motive?
249.
by valine 3y ago
I’d be down. Shoot me an email: hn@valine.io
250.
by valine 3y ago
> Can we though? What calculation is this based on? What calculations is your conjecture that AI will spiral out of control based on? You're not allowed to cite Hollywood movies. The science behind the nuclear bomb was well understo
251.
by valine 3y ago
Dog fighting AI isn’t going to end the world. When people talk about the “risks” associated with AI they’re talking about an AI that spirals out of control and destroys civilization. Something something infinite paper clip optimizer. It’s s
252.
by valine 3y ago
Its not feasible to worry about the implications of every imaginary technology. Nuclear chain reactions were first theorized to exist a decade before the first bomb dropped. Should scientists have stopped exploring quantum mechanics in the
253.
by valine 3y ago
It’ll be ok. The technology for “dangerous” AI doesn’t actually exist. The near term risks we face from AI are constrained to the realms of spam and privacy. World ending super-bots are science fiction.
254.
by valine 3y ago
Just because a treatment doesn’t work doesn’t make it snake oil. Snake oil implies intent to deceive. Untested drugs can be based on a strong theoretical foundation and still not work. I expect the majority of experimental treatments won’t
255.
by valine 3y ago
Yeah that’ll do it. 3it/s sounds normal then.
256.
by valine 3y ago
is/s depends on resolution and other factors like batch size. What are you getting for 512x image?
257.
by valine 3y ago
Its true. I've been installing nightly builds of pytorch for months specifically to access this fix. Have been getting 40it/s outputting a 512x512 image on my 4090. Prior to the fix would get around 19it/s.
258.
by valine 3y ago
Yes, that would be amazing.
259.
by valine 3y ago
The reason you would insert an LLM into the vision stack is to deal with the weird and unexpected. Tesla’s current stop sign approach is to train a classifier from scratch on thousands of stop signs images. It’s not surprising that architec
260.
by valine 3y ago
Automatic emergency braking would be a good first step, it would certainly solve the case in article where the car drives though downed power lines. I think the logical next step is to have the LLM output the driving path similar to how GPT
261.
by valine 3y ago
No you don’t. I can feed images of crazy driving scenarios into LLaVA and get reasonable responses. That’s a general purpose LLM with $500 worth of fine tuning running locally on my PC. You should look into what can be done with the current
262.
by valine 3y ago
Why does it require AGI? That's a bold, unsubstantiated claim. Let me make my own bold claim: Simple common sense reasoning is very close to being solved with our latest LLMs. You would need AGI if you wanted to replace the team develo
263.
by valine 3y ago
Would be easier to change the paint job. Just disguise them as regular taxis.
264.
by valine 3y ago
LLaMA isn’t licensed for commercial use. It’s probably an update to the licensing. Facebook benefits heavily from the open source development done on LLaMA. There was a report I saw that facebook has started using llama.cpp internally for i
265.
by valine 3y ago
Your analogy makes zero sense. You can’t go to war without weapons, but there are a million ways to copy someone’s likeness that don’t involve AI. To name a few: Masks, makeup, 3D scans and head tracking, cartoons (live action character dep
266.
by valine 3y ago
No. It’s not. The weapon is the contract being forced on everyone in the industry. AI is certainly a nice cover for a policy Hollywood executives have been salivating over for decades. You clearly fell for it.
267.
by valine 3y ago
Why is this the fault of AI researchers? Hollywood executives are trying to own everyone's likeness for free. That has nothing to do with AI; it's run of the mill greed. They tried to do the same thing to Crispin Glover back in th
268.
by valine 3y ago
We don’t have a solid understanding of what it means to be intelligent, and despite the advances with LLMs, have yet to produce anything close to general cognition. I wouldn’t say dangerous AI is out of the realm of possibilities, only that
269.
by valine 3y ago
They're presented as a hypothetical scary technology, not something that actually exists today. That framing is important to the conversation. The author is acting like there's a decision to be made. Pretending that open source mo
270.
by valine 3y ago
It’s intellectually dishonest in my opinion.

More ›