3 ms·
No. It’s not. The weapon is the contract being forced on everyone in the industry. AI is certainly a nice cover for a policy Hollywood executives have been sal
by valine 3y ago
No. It’s not. The weapon is the contract being forced on everyone in the industry.
AI is certainly a nice cover for a policy Hollywood executives have been salivating over for decades. You clearly fell for it.
- uoaei 3y agoAdvanced weapons are certainly a nice cover for a policy 4-star generals have been salivating over for decades (namely, war). You clearly fell for it. If your argument is invalidated by the most transparent and effortless of satire, it's not a good argument.
- valine 3y agoYour analogy makes zero sense. You can’t go to war without weapons, but there are a million ways to copy someone’s likeness that don’t involve AI. To name a few: Masks, makeup, 3D scans and head tracking, cartoons (live action character depicted in cartoon form). Owning the rights to your likeness has nothing to do with AI and never has.
- uoaei 3y agoThat seems like a performatively narrow critique that conveniently avoids the broader conversation we're engaged in.