v7x

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by v7x 7y ago

   I agree with most of the article, but the author faltered in the area I predicted he would before I began to read. He expresses fear that without some restraint that sites might become "like 8chan". To which I have to ask, why is
2. 2.▲
   by v7x 7y ago

   So long as certain content (that is not restricted by external forces, i.e. the law) is prohibited from the platform, I fail to see why they should be considered anything other than a publisher. If the platform can only be used for content
3. 3.▲
   by v7x 7y ago

   Twitter labeled it, so it must be fake! Twitter didn't label it, so it must be real!
4. 4.▲
   by v7x 7y ago

   When you are as big and as powerful as Google, the more your every action will be scrutinized. Thats the way it should be, as any move an entity of their size makes will cause waves the world over. Is all the criticism justified? Maybe, may
5. 5.▲
   by v7x 7y ago

   >Also, tackling safety and bias in the models is a key focus area for us, and given the challenges related to this, we are not currently releasing an external research demo. Read: We don't want the internet to turn our program into
6. 6.▲
   by v7x 7y ago

   I see a few comments in here, and have seen similar comments in similar topics in other threads, saying that they dont understand why anyone would choose this over other FOSS licenses. These questions are asked from a developer-centric pers