ux266478

11 ms·

91.
by ux266478 2mo ago
For me, Elixir misses the mark. If you're an unc with a background in Ruby or that era of webdev, I can see the appeal. It's a familiar set dressing. I don't have that background, I much prefer the syntactic structure of Erla
92.
by ux266478 2mo ago
I find that lamentation a bit funny, because the list in practice is never really complete. For instance, you forgot the mighty Prolog. Surely, tcl belongs on there too.
93.
by ux266478 2mo ago
> The assumption you make is the classic LLM mistake of thinking writing code === building software. Not quite. I'd agree with you if you try to do code generation in one-shot, but the agentic loop importantly isn't that. Natur
94.
by ux266478 2mo ago
The article posted is basically entirely about that.
95.
by ux266478 2mo ago
I accept your concession. The humiliation of irrationally committed foundationalists has been a long time coming, so it's good you're trying to get ahead of the curve.
96.
by ux266478 2mo ago
> In the $150/mo range you can get effectively unlimited usage of GPT 5.6 Sol With 5 active sessions going nonstop? That seems like a pretty important qualifier.
97.
by ux266478 2mo ago
The nice thing about natural language is that nesting semantic layers is free and arbitrary, and far more tractable than in a formal grammar. Every natural language is like coherentist ω-order logic. Effectively, I don't have to write
98.
by ux266478 2mo ago
Then you've failed the criteria of sufficiently advanced. It's perfectly fine to cast doubt we'll see scaling to this generalization, but you're not casting doubt you're outright rejecting the premise in-confidence.
99.
by ux266478 2mo ago
I think it's even more pervasive than that. Why bother forking software at all? At the point in which code generation is meaningfully trivialized, software becomes entirely disposable. Anything you want, have a model spin it up. You do
100.
by ux266478 2mo ago
Not really, because that's not a unique aspect of any of those. It's true of all subscription services (that I'm aware of), as well as all of the free models. The selection bias primarily will be against models which be an ou
101.
by ux266478 2mo ago
At last, a valid usecase for VCs.
102.
by ux266478 2mo ago
What status quo? Just look at Openrouter's rankings: https://openrouter.ai/rankings Things change radically month to month. Nobody is remotely close to capturing the market or having any kind of stability over time. Pe
103.
by ux266478 2mo ago
Gonna have to point out that's a KVM CVE. I was very specific about using a bytecode interpreter . If you're serious about a secure sandbox, you don't touch hardware virtualization with a 10 foot pole. In fact, you don'
104.
by ux266478 2mo ago
> I'm not referring to the verb form The original post prompting your complaint used the verb form. And hence why you're confused. > It's embarrassing, or it would be if people were still possessed of the capacity for s
105.
by ux266478 2mo ago
> My initial research indicates that the field of "static language that natively supports capabilities" is surprisingly uncovered and there may be a rich field there. You want to look for white papers that talk about object-cap
106.
by ux266478 2mo ago
If the sandbox has vulnerabilities, which you can also use the AI to fuzz for. Obviously at the point in which it can talk to the internet it doesn't really matter, but there are a very finite number of zero-days that can exist in a by
107.
by ux266478 2mo ago
I think you're confused. The verb form of the word never carried the credentialism of the title. In the same way that "doctoring" never carried the connotation of a medical degree. Of course the original sense of the noun was
108.
by ux266478 2mo ago
The farm bill he enacted in his first term was a pretty solid legalization middle ground. The fact he flipped around on it in his second term makes me think it's more accidental than anything.
109.
by ux266478 2mo ago
I think the problem is that you're implicitly assuming a mutual exclusion, but it doesn't exist. IE you can have a problem with the law's existence, and also have a problem with an enforcement system that selectively enforces
110.
by ux266478 2mo ago
The problem is that law is reactive, and punishment entails the harm already happened. Some dumbass kid getting convicted for committing a cybercrime with AI doesn't do anything to get rid of the structural problems that enabled it. Th
111.
by ux266478 2mo ago
> The threat of semi-autonomous AI threat actors will never go away until the financial incentive that buoys unchecked growth at all costs goes away. It's not going away unless computers themselves go away or become massively less p
112.
by ux266478 2mo ago
Unless HF presses charges (and it doesn't seem like they are), I'm not sure that's even possible.
113.
by ux266478 2mo ago
> In July, OpenAI unleashed an experimental artificial intelligence model that, without reasonable controls or oversight Either this case is entirely for show (likely), or the AG is really bad at their job. This argument isn't going
114.
by ux266478 3mo ago
DRM is a software layer that restricts your ability to run a given program, in this context it's specifically a form of access control. It has nothing to do with anything you just said.
115.
by ux266478 3mo ago
GOG's storefront backend is also much nicer than Steam's. The latter is a dungeon crawl through like 3 different UIs, I still don't know how to navigate to the depot page reliably despite using it for years.
116.
by ux266478 3mo ago
If you don't do any attention steering, custom decoding or meddle with the weights maybe. Services are worthless unless all you do is write positive prompts. As others have mentioned, there's the privacy factor as well.
117.
by ux266478 3mo ago
No, because that was never the problem. We already had lightspeed prototyping. The industry's best practices are basically entirely geared towards rapid prototyping and we're scary good at it. Fact of the matter is, games are alre
118.
by ux266478 3mo ago
Word games aren't scientific in the slightest, and as Hume says on verbal arguments in general, they "cannot possibly be of any importance."
119.
by ux266478 3mo ago
It's not that surprising to me. Most of the innovation in Chinese models has been in efficiency gains and optimizations. K3 coming from the factory in MXFP4 weights is a pretty relevant factor. Big performance gap probably also due to
120.
by ux266478 3mo ago
They're things we are intentionally engineering in our own image, based on massive statistical analysis of our own actions and behavior. So what's there to not understand? If this wasn't the case, that would be much weirder.

More ›